4.11 Profiling assessments were reviewed and moderated by the Office of the Infrastructure Coordinator with the objective of promoting consistency of ratings across initiatives as well as to ensure adequate regard had been had for the impact of major urban road initiatives on greenhouse gas emissions and the 'transformation of cities' priority. The results were endorsed by the Prioritisation Evaluation Committee with a presentation by the Office of the Infrastructure Coordinator to the Council at its 1 December 2008 meeting outlining that 69 projects had been profiled (that is, those projects with an assessment outcome in Table 4.1 of Excellent, Strong, Basic or Weak).
Table 4.1 Profiling assessment outcomes: December 2008
Moderated assessment outcome | Underlying profiling assessment rating | Number of projects in category |
Excellent | Very Good | 10 (11%) |
Strong | Good | 15 (16%) |
Basic | Basic | 41 (43%) |
Weak | Weak | 3 (3%) |
Unsound | Unsound | Nil |
Inadequate Information | Inadequate Information | 10 (11%) |
No assessment | No assessment | 15 (16%) |
Total |
| 94 |
Source: ANAO analysis of Office of the Infrastructure Coordinator data.