Can the measure(s) be objectively assessed?

  Are the measures understood by all parties?

  Do the measures assess all the important aspects of performance, rather than what is easy to measure?

  Do the measures include bases for comparison; are the performance measures allowing judgements to be made about contractor performance?

  Is the performance regime cost effective to administer for both parties?

  Are the skills available to assess whether or not contractor performance is satisfactory?

  Do the measures focus contractor performance on the outcomes to be achieved?

  Do the measures encourage performance improvement over the life of the contract?

  Does contractor performance against the measures provide the basis for making payments?

  Has a process been established to review the performance regime periodically to ensure its ongoing relevance?

  Has consideration been given to the collection and analysis of performance data? For example, is it better to use an independent third party or technical expert?