Review | Major System / Platform Variant | Original Planned | Current Planned | Achieved /Forecast | Variance (Months) | Notes | ||
System | MRTT Aircraft | Feb 05 | Feb 05 | Mar 05 | 1 |
| ||
System | Simulation Devices | May 06 | May 06 | Oct 06 | 5 |
| ||
Preliminary | MRTT Aircraft | Jun 05 | Jun 05 | Jun 05 | 0 |
| ||
Simulation Devices | Sep 06 | Sep 06 | Jun 07 | 9 |
| |||
Simulation Devices Facility | Sep 06 | May 07 | Jul 07 | 10 |
| |||
Critical Design | MRTT Aircraft | Feb 06 | Mar 06 | Jun 06 | 4 | 1 | ||
| Simulation Devices | Mar 07 | Jan 08 | Jan 09 | 22 | 2 | ||
| Simulation Devices Facility | Apr 07 | Nov 07 | Jan 09 | 21 | 3 | ||
| Aerial Refuelling Boom System | Sep 11 | Sep 11 | Sep 11 | 0 | 4 | ||
Final Design | MRTT Aircraft | Sep 06 | Sep 06 | Jul 07 | 10 | 1 | ||
| Aerial Refuelling Boom System | Dec 11 | Dec 11 | Dec 11 | 0 | 4 | ||
Notes | ||||||||
| The MRTT Aircraft Critical Design Review (CDR) was conducted over a series of meetings from February to May 2006. Although design for the majority of the aircraft systems had been satisfactorily completed, the design for key elements of the aircraft mission system was not yet mature. "Practical Completion" of the CDR Milestone was achieved in June 2006; with a follow-on milestone (designated as the Final Design Review (FDR). Concurrently, evaluations of the new Remote Aerial Refuelling Operator console identified the need for changes to the cockpit layout. These changes were agreed as part of the CDR close-out and required a change to the conversion and test process, which was split into two phases: Phase 1 for structural conversion and civil certification, and Phase 2 for installation of the military avionics and military certification. Closure of the residual activities to achieve the FDR proved problematic. These were progressively completed over the following 12 months. | |||||||
2 | Delays to completion of the MRTT Aircraft design process had a knock-on impact to completion of the Simulation Devices CDR. | |||||||
3 | Completion of the CDR for the Simulation Devices Facility was delayed due to redesign to accommodate increased security requirements. | |||||||
4 | Additional design review milestones have been added for development of improvements to the Aerial Refuelling Boom System. | |||||||