Review | Major System / Platform Variant | Original Planned | Current Planned | Achieved/Forecast | Variance (Months) | Notes |
System Requirements | Mk3E Combat Management System/Phased Array Radar - Stage 1 (Requirements Review) | Mar 06 |
| May 06 | 2 | 1 |
Mk3E Combat Management System - Stage 2 (Requirements Review) | N/A |
| Aug 09 | N/A | 1 | |
Mk3E Combat Management System/Phased Array Radar - Stage 1 (Functional Review) | Jun 06 |
| Aug 06 | 2 |
| |
Preliminary Design | Mk3E Combat Management System/Phased Array Radar Preliminary Design Review | Dec 06 |
| Aug 07 | 8 | 1 |
ASMD Shore Facilities (HMAS Stirling) | N/A |
| Aug 08 | N/A |
| |
Critical Design | Mk3E Combat Management System (Phased Array Radar integration) - Stage 1 Critical Design Review - Part 2 | Dec 07 |
| Aug 08 | 8 | 1 |
Mk3E Combat Management System - Stage 2 Critical Design Review | Nov 10 | Sep 11 | Sep 11 | 10 | 2 | |
ASMD Shore Facilities (HMAS Stirling) | N/A |
| Dec 08 | N/A |
| |
Phased Array Radar | Oct 07 |
| Oct 07 | 0 |
| |
Notes | ||||||
1 | Variance in design reviews is directly related to the change of acquisition strategy (movement from an eight ship program to a single ship program) or delay in initial contract award for phased array radar system. | |||||
2 | Variance in Stage 2 Critical Design Review (CDR) date has been as a result of delays in finalising Defence's requirements in the Software update. This was completed in April 2011 with CDR appropriately rescheduled. There is no impact to final Stage 2 software release date. | |||||