| Identified Risks (risk identified by standard project risk management processes) | |
| Description | Remedial Action |
| There is a chance that slippages to the boat FCD schedule will impact the installation of engineering enhancements and new capability, leading to cost and schedule increases to the project. | This risk is being treated by: • Obtaining endorsement of the IMS at the senior management level; • Improving management of maintenance schedules; and • Ensuring configuration changes are captured in the targeted maintenance availabilities Total Work Package. |
| There is a chance that competing workload demands will reduce the skilled resources available at the contractor facility and impact the installation and testing of engineering enhancements on boats, leading to cost and schedule increases. | This risk is being treated by: • Undertaking engineering enhancement in accordance with the IMS; • Resolving design issues with engineering enhancements early to improve design maturity; and • Coordinating the engineering enhancement workload on the ASC capped workforce. |
| There is a chance that a lack of submarine sea time will impact the completion and evaluation of sea trials of prototype engineering enhancements, leading to schedule delays and cost increases to the final design. | This risk is being treated by: • Using the IMS to establish long-term planning of sea trials to improve the coordination of submarine availability; • Engaging with stakeholders to communicate, in advance, test schedules and boat availability needs; and • Monitoring the status of submarine availability and impact on sea acceptance testing and trials. |
| Emergent Risks (risk not previously identified but has e | |
| Description | Remedial Action |
| N/A | N/A |