| Recorded Optimism Bias (%)14 | Non-standard Buildings | Standard Buildings | |||||||
| 39 | 51 | - | 1 | 4 | 24 | - | - | ||
| Capital Expenditure | Operating Expenditure | Capital Expenditure | Operating Expenditure | ||||||
| Risk Area Contributions to Recorded Optimism Bias (%)15 | Non-standard Buildings | Standard Buildings | |||||||
| Procurement | Complexity of Contract Structure | 2 | 1 | - | 50 | - | - | ||
| Late Contractor Involvement in Design | 4 | 2 | - | 5 | 2 | - | - | ||
| Poor Contractor Capabilities | 5 | 5 | - | 50 | 9 | 9 | - | - | |
| Government Guidelines | - | - | - | ||||||
| Dispute and Claims Occurred | 11 | 16 | - | 10 | 29 | - | - | ||
| Information management | - | - | - | ||||||
| Other (specify) | - | - | - | ||||||
| Project Specific | Design Complexity | 7 | 3 | - | 4 | 1 | - | - | |
| Degree of Innovation | < 1 | - | 3 | 4 | - | - | |||
| Environmental Impact | - | - | - | ||||||
| Other (specify) | 3 | 8 | - | - | - | ||||
| Client Specific | Inadequacy of the Business Case | 32 | 35 | - | 42 | 34 | - | - | |
| Large Number of Stakeholders | - | 8 | - | - | |||||
| Funding Availability | 2 | - | - | - | |||||
| Project Management Team | 4 | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | |||
| Poor Project Intelligence | < 1 | < 1 | - | 2 | - | - | |||
| Other (specify) | 6 | 2 | - | < 1 | - | - | |||
| Environment | Public Relations | - | 2 | - | - | ||||
| Site Characteristics | 5 | 1 | - | 10 | 2 | - | - | ||
| Permits / Consents / Approvals | < 1 | < 1 | - | - | - | ||||
| Other (specify) | 4 | 3 | - | - | - | ||||
| External Influences | Political | 9 | - | - | - | ||||
| Economic | 13 | - | 11 | - | - | ||||
| Legislation / Regulations | 5 | 7 | - | 9 | 3 | - | - | ||
| Technology | - | - | - | ||||||
| Other (specify) | 2 | - | - | - | |||||
- No information was available
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
14 This table should not be used for calculating optimism bias levels for current projects.
15 Contributions from each project risk area are expressed as a % of the recorded optimism bias. Note: The sum of individual percentages contributions in each column may not add up to 100% due to rounding errors.