| Upper Bound Optimism Bias (%)22 | Non-standard Buildings | Standard Buildings | ||||
| 39 | 51 | 4 | 24 | |||
|
| Capital Expenditure | Capital Expenditure | ||||
| Risk Area Contributions to Upper Bound Optimism Bias (%)23 | Non-standard Buildings | Standard Buildings | ||||
| Procurement | Complexity of Contract Structure | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| |
| Late Contractor Involvement in Design | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Poor Contractor Capabilities | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | ||
| Government Guidelines |
|
|
|
| ||
| Dispute and Claims Occurred | 5 | 11 | 4 | 29 | ||
| Information management |
|
|
|
| ||
| Other (specify) |
|
|
|
| ||
| Project Specific | Design Complexity | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| Degree of Innovation | 8 | 9 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Environmental Impact |
|
|
|
| ||
| Other (specify) | 5 | 5 |
|
| ||
| Client Specific | Inadequacy of the Business Case | 22 | 23 | 31 | 34 | |
| Large Number of Stakeholders |
|
| 6 |
| ||
| Funding Availability | 3 |
| 8 |
| ||
| Project Management Team | 5 | 2 |
| 1 | ||
| Poor Project Intelligence | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | ||
| Other (specify) | 1 | 2 |
| < 1 | ||
| Environment | Public Relations |
|
| 8 | 2 | |
| Site Characteristics | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | ||
| Permits / Consents / Approvals | 3 | < 1 | 9 |
| ||
| Other (specify) | 1 | 3 |
|
| ||
| Political | 13 |
|
|
| ||
| Economic |
| 13 |
| 11 | ||
| External Influences | Legislation / Regulations | 6 | 7 | 9 | 3 | |
| Technology | 4 | 5 |
|
| ||
| Other (specify) |
| 2 |
|
| ||
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
22 Note that these are only indicative starting values for calculating optimism bias contributions, because a project's optimism bias profile (contributions from project risk areas) will change during its project life-cycle.
23 Contributions from each project risk area are expressed as a % of the recorded optimism bias. Note: The sum of individual percentages contributions in each column may not add up to 100% due to rounding errors.