OBJECTIVE

In this part of the P3 business case, the project sponsor should:

• Articulate why the decision has been taken to explore a P3 and how the project was determined to be a suitable P3 candidate. Such decision should, whenever possible, be linked to project specific objectives and findings from any and all project related studies and relevant P3 screening (see Figure 4 below)

Figure 4: High-level P3 suitability screening criteria

Screening criterion

Relevant consideration(s)

Project size

Is the project's size sufficient to support the P3 costs?

Contract bundling

Is there potential to bundle a number of contracts into a single long term contract?

Nature of the project

Is the project a new build or a refurbishment?

Project integration

Is the project separated or integrated with existing assets or networks?

Consistency

Will the performance requirements and use of the project be relatively stable over time?

Performance Measurement

Can service performance be easily described and measured?

Asset life

Does the asset have an expected useful life greater than 20 years?

Maintenance requirements

Does the project have significant maintenance requirements?

Refurbishment requirements

Is the refurbishment cyce for the project relatively predictable and stable?

Limiting Factors

Are there stakeholders and/or other factors that influence transferability of the project's maintenance and operations

Innovation

Is there scope for innovation in design construction or operations?

Revenue

Is there scope for the private partner to generate additional ancillary revenues?

• Present and describe a range of viable and "marketable" P3 delivery models. It is important to note that while there is a wide spectrum of P3 delivery models that could be used for any project (as shown in Figure 5 below), a sponsor should work with their transaction and financial advisors, and use information from precedent projects identified through any inter-jurisdictional studies, to narrow the options of a commercially acceptable and viable range of P3 delivery models (e.g. 3 or 4 projects).

• Identify any sponsor constraints that would preclude the use of a commercially acceptable and viable project delivery model should be disclosed and discussed in the business case