● Increase in the impact of assurance (time, cost and quality)
● Increase in project action following assurance
● Increase in the perception of reviewer quality
● Evidence that project staff are using and learning from the lessons of past projects; i.e. a reduction in the number of repeated lessons learned
● Improvement in stakeholder perception of the value of assurance
● Improvement in stakeholder perception on the degree of system integration
Appendix One, Figures 3 to 6, provides more detail on each of the core elements of the assurance system including:
● The objective for each element
● The guiding principles that should be adhered to
● A description of the ideal state, the current position and a gap analysis
● A set of suggested priority actions to close the gap
● A list of measures to check whether the gaps are being closed
| Figure 2 The core elements of an effective assurance system Source: National Audit Office |