Comparison of Appraisal and Evaluation

7.19  Box 25 sets out the differences between undertaking an assessment at the outset, in support of government intervention - appraisal - and undertaking an assessment to evaluate how successful such action has been - evaluation.

BOX 25:  COMPARISON OF APPRAISAL AND EVALUATION

 

Appraisal

Evaluation

Aim

Ex ante assessment of whether action is worthwhile and impacts

Ex post assessment of whether action was worthwhile and impacts

Use of Output

Project procurement, policy and programme design

Feedback for:

(a)  future procurement, project management,

(b)  wider policy debate, and

(c)  future programme management.

Application

Projects, policies and programmes

Projects, policies and programmes

Timing

Always prior to implementation

  During implementation ('formative')

  After implementation ('summative')

Data

Forecasted

Historic and current, estimated and actual. Estimates of counterfactuals

Method

Comparison of options against 'do nothing' option



Estimated assessment of risk

Comparison of results against 'do nothing' option
Comparison of actual outturns against target outturns/ alternative outturns

Assessment of risks that did or did not materialise

Analytical Techniques

Cost Benefit/ Effectiveness Analysis Discounted cash flow analysis Multi-criteria analysis Other statistical analysis

Cost Benefit/ Effectiveness Analysis Discounted cash flow analysis Multi-criteria analysis Other statistical analysis - e.g.: analysis of performance indicators

Decision Criteria

Comparison of NPV, NPC for different options Non quantifiable factors may be included if quantification impossible

Consideration of whether correct criteria were used

Audit and Enforcement

Public Accounts Committee (PAC), NAO, HMT, OGC Gateways 0, 1 Departmental arrangements

PAC, NAO, HMT, OGC Gateway 5, Departmental arrangements

BOX 26:  EXAMPLE 'EXPANDING VOCATIONAL TRAINING' - QUESTIONS FOR EVALUATION:

  To what extent did the anticipated costs and benefits match the actual outcome ('benefits realisation')?

  In the light of experience with the target group of trainees, would better results have been achieved if this group had been more tightly defined, e.g. the alternative option of focusing purely on low or unskilled workers?

  Has any new information about the impact of vocational training come to light since the policy was implemented? (i.e. how effective is it in meeting objectives)?

  Were the risks assumed for completion of the training course justified or did they understate/exaggerate the true risk?

  Control group - how does the productivity of those individuals who undertook training compare to the productivity of workers of similar skill who were not offered training?