<Provide a very short (300-400 words) executive summary here of the key messages you want the document to convey. Typical statements that you should make here include:
(1) An overview of the value for money analysis outcomes (NPV dollars (and percentage) saved, total NPV value of contract, etc.)
(2) A very brief overview of the project; discuss the project scope in very general terms, and what the impact was on project schedule versus traditional procurement. Was the use of a P3 model the right approach to take?
(3) A brief overview of the project's official inception (announcement by Minister, or Treasury Board approval to move ahead as a P3)
(4) Any special features that make the project unique or innovative in any way (e.g. core school designs, etc.). How did this project align with the overall goals of the GOA or the Ministry (safer roads for Albertans, schools where children live, better health outcomes, etc.)
(5) A brief statement about the signature of the agreement (who are the major parties to the agreement? Ministry/name of SPV). When was it signed? How long is the term? What is Availability date?
• A synopsis on how the savings were derived (5 or 6 bullets discussing economies of scale, construction efficiencies, innovations, etc.>
This report explains what a P3 is and why it may be used, provides a value for money assessment of the P3 for <short name of project>, and provides a project report.1 <Provide a footnote discussing which Ministries were responsible for the report preparation, as shown below>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 This report was developed by <Provide Name of Ministry or Ministries> following the value for money methodology in the Government of Alberta's Management Framework: Assessment Process.