Based on our analysis, we conclude the following:
• there were no substantive scope changes to the core convention facility
• interactive bidding and structured negotiations assisted in refining the proponents' bids
• the post-bid additions to the project (i.e. the agreement in principle to integrate the old South Wharf docks and sheds) are within the parameters of costs that the State was likely to have incurred to maintain and protect the heritage waterfront precinct
• the post-tender project changes did not have any material impact on the tender put to market, thus maintaining a fair tender process.