All project were rated as either "Good" or "Satisfactory" overall, although the rating for one project should be regarded as provisional until the project is fully complete. However, any problems on that project appear so far to be largely attributable to interface problems with a related, public-sector procurement project. One project was strong on Relevance but weak on Efficacy; the project is over-budget and late. The problem has not been with the Provider; it has been the inability of the public-sector Promoter to define its needs and to manage multiple, interlocking PPPs. Once complete, and assuming the full benefits are being achieved, the Satisfactory rating would almost certainly apply to both Relevance and Efficacy.