Project Characteristics and Status Summary

3.3 Table 3.1 notes the key characteristics that typify the 15 projects and provides a holistic picture of their key attributes.

3.4 Table 3.2 provides a composite picture of the cost and schedule performance of all 15 projects as at 30 June 2009.

Table 3.1 - Project Characteristics

Project

Service Customer37

Type of Capability38

Type39

ACAT40

Kinnaird41

Maturity Stage42

Prime System Integrator43

AWD Ships

Navy

New

Australianised MOTS

1

Post

Preliminary Design Review

AWD Alliance

Super Hornet

Air Force

Replace

MOTS

2

Post

System Integration Test

US Navy(FMS)

MRH90

Army/Navy

Replace

Australianised MOTS

2

Pre

Acceptance Test

Australian Aerospace

Wedgetail

Air Force

New

Developmental

1

Pre

Critical Design Review

Boeing Company

LHD Ships

Joint

New

Australianised MOTS

1

Post

Preliminary Design Review

BAE Systems Australia

ARH Tiger

Army

New

Australianised MOTS

2

Pre

System Integration Test

Australian Aerospace

Air to Air Refuel

Air Force

New

Developmental

2

Pre

System Integration Test

Airbus Military

C-17 Heavy Airlift

Air Force

New

MOTS

2

Post

Acceptance Into Service

US Air Force (FMS)

Hornet Upgrade

Air Force

Upgrade

Australianised MOTS

2

Pre

System Integration Test

DMO

FFG Upgrade

Navy

Upgrade

Developmental

2

Pre

Acceptance Test

Thales

Hornet Refurb

Air Force

Upgrade

N/A

2

Pre

Acceptance Into Service

DMO

Bushranger

Army

New

Australianised MOTS

3

Pre

Acceptance Test

Thales

HF Modernisation

Joint

Upgrade

Developmental

2

Pre

System Integration Test

Boeing Defence Australia

Armidales

Navy

Replace

Australianised MOTS

3

Pre

Acceptance Into Service

Defence Maritime Services

Collins RCS

Navy

Upgrade

Australianised MOTS

2

Pre

System Integration Test

DMO

Table 3.2 Project Cost and Schedule Status Summary 2008-09

Project

2nd Pass Budget 44

Current Budget 45

Indexation/ Exchange 46

Scope Changes 47

Transfers 48

$Net Variation 49

% Net Variation

Original FOC

Current FOC

Variance Factor 50

AWD Ships

7,207.4

8,260.7

1,053.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0%

Dec 18

Dec 18

1.0

Super Hornet

3,545.8

4,309.8

797.3

0.0

-33.3

0.0

0.0%

Dec 12

Dec 12

1.0

MRH90

957.2

4,199.2

883.9

2,597.151

-239.0

0.0

0.0%

Jul 14

Jul 14

1.0

Wedgetail

3,269.5

4,154.2

463.1

225.6

-18.9

214.9

6.6%

Dec 08

Dec 12

1.5

LHD Ships

2,959.4

3,542.0

573.2

0.0

9.4

0.0

0.0%

Nov 16

Nov 16

1.0

ARH Tiger

1,584.0

2,101.4

608.4

0.0

-84.3

-6.7

-0.4%

Jun 09

Dec 12

1.3

Air to Air Refuel

2,076.6

2,087.6

300.1

0.0

-135.5

-153.6

-7.4%

Mar 11

Qtr3 12

1.2

C-17 Heavy Airlift

1,864.4

2,054.8

190.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0%

Dec 11

Jan 11

0.8

Hornet Upgrade

1,300.0

2,041.6

488.5

221.5

35.0

-3.4

-0.3%

Aug 11

Aug 11

1.0

FFG Upgrade

1,392.5

1,536.9

297.8

0.0

-152.7

-0.7

-0.1%

Dec 05

Dec 09

1.6

Hornet Refurb

156.6

937.8

108.7

673.5

0.0

-1.0

-0.6%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Bushranger

295.0

930.7

120.3

515.4

0.0

0.0

0.0%

Apr 12

Apr 12

1.0

HF Modernisation

505.0

660.6

150.1

11.0

-4.7

-0.8

-0.2%

May 05

2016

2.2

Armidales

436.8

535.3

60.5

67.1

-29.8

0.7

0.2%

Mar 09

Dec 11

1.4

Collins RCS

455.3

458.6

5.0

0.0

-0.9

-0.8

-0.2%

2010

2016

1.8

Total

28,005.5

37,811.2

6,100.6

4,311.2

-654.7

48.6

0.2%

-

-

1.28




_______________________________________________________________________________

37 The ADF customer who will be the Capability Manager when equipment/ systems enter service.

38 'New' - a capability that has not previously existed in the ADF; 'Replacement' - a current capability that is being replaced by more up to date technology or to respond to a changing threat; 'Upgrade' - an upgrade to existing capabilities.

39 'Developmental' - Involving substantial design development and systems integration; 'MOTS/COTS' - Off-the-shelf equipment of Military or Commercial origin; and 'Australianised' MOTS/ COTS, an off-the-shelf design with significant levels of unique adaptation for Australian requirements.

40 The DMO's categorisation of projects that represent the complexity of the project on a sliding scale of 1 to 4, with ACAT 1 representing the most complex projects.

41 Provides an indication of whether the projects were initially developed under pre-or post Kinnaird reforms.

42 Provides an indication of maturity of a project based on the benchmark stage of a project.

43 Identifies the entity that has prime systems integrator responsibility for delivering mission and support systems for the project.

44 The portion of Second Pass budget approved by Government, transferred to the DMO under a MAA with Defence for delivery of the materiel system ($millions).

45 The current budget that takes account of all price indexation, foreign exchange and real variations from Second Pass Approval ($millions).

46 The total of price indexation and foreign exchange variations between the Current and 2nd Pass Approved budget ($millions), outside of the DMO's capacity to control.

47 The total of all approved quantity changes to the project's scope between the Current and 2nd Pass Approved budget ($millions).

48 The total of all transfers to and from other Defence Groups (i.e. Defence Support Group) and DMO projects ($millions).

49 The net variation after accounting for all price indexation, foreign exchange, scope change and transfer variations since the 2nd Pass Approved budget ($millions).

50 A schedule variance factor of 1 = on time; >1 = late; and <1 = early.

51 The significant scope increase for the MRH90 project is a result of Government decision to increase aircraft quantities from 12 to 46.