3.3 Table 3.1 notes the key characteristics that typify the 15 projects and provides a holistic picture of their key attributes.
3.4 Table 3.2 provides a composite picture of the cost and schedule performance of all 15 projects as at 30 June 2009.
| Project | Type of Capability38 | Type39 | Maturity Stage42 | Prime System Integrator43 | |||
| AWD Ships | Navy | New | Australianised MOTS | 1 | Post | Preliminary Design Review | AWD Alliance |
| Super Hornet | Air Force | Replace | 2 | Post | System Integration Test | ||
| MRH90 | Army/Navy | Replace | Australianised MOTS | 2 | Pre | Acceptance Test | Australian Aerospace |
| Wedgetail | Air Force | New | Developmental | 1 | Pre | Critical Design Review | Boeing Company |
| LHD Ships | Joint | New | Australianised MOTS | 1 | Post | Preliminary Design Review | BAE Systems Australia |
| ARH Tiger | Army | New | Australianised MOTS | 2 | Pre | System Integration Test | Australian Aerospace |
| Air to Air Refuel | Air Force | New | Developmental | 2 | Pre | System Integration Test | Airbus Military |
| C-17 Heavy Airlift | Air Force | New | 2 | Post | Acceptance Into Service | ||
| Hornet Upgrade | Air Force | Upgrade | Australianised MOTS | 2 | Pre | System Integration Test | |
| FFG Upgrade | Navy | Upgrade | Developmental | 2 | Pre | Acceptance Test | Thales |
| Hornet Refurb | Air Force | Upgrade | N/A | 2 | Pre | Acceptance Into Service | |
| Bushranger | Army | New | Australianised MOTS | 3 | Pre | Acceptance Test | Thales |
| HF Modernisation | Joint | Upgrade | Developmental | 2 | Pre | System Integration Test | Boeing Defence Australia |
| Armidales | Navy | Replace | Australianised MOTS | 3 | Pre | Acceptance Into Service | Defence Maritime Services |
| Collins RCS | Navy | Upgrade | Australianised MOTS | 2 | Pre | System Integration Test |
| Project | 2nd Pass Budget 44 | Current Budget 45 | Indexation/ Exchange 46 | Scope Changes 47 | Transfers 48 | $Net Variation 49 | % Net Variation | Original FOC | Current FOC | Variance Factor 50 |
| AWD Ships | 7,207.4 | 8,260.7 | 1,053.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Dec 18 | Dec 18 | 1.0 |
| Super Hornet | 3,545.8 | 4,309.8 | 797.3 | 0.0 | -33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Dec 12 | Dec 12 | 1.0 |
| MRH90 | 957.2 | 4,199.2 | 883.9 | 2,597.151 | -239.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Jul 14 | Jul 14 | 1.0 |
| Wedgetail | 3,269.5 | 4,154.2 | 463.1 | 225.6 | -18.9 | 214.9 | 6.6% | Dec 08 | Dec 12 | 1.5 |
| LHD Ships | 2,959.4 | 3,542.0 | 573.2 | 0.0 | 9.4 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Nov 16 | Nov 16 | 1.0 |
| ARH Tiger | 1,584.0 | 2,101.4 | 608.4 | 0.0 | -84.3 | -6.7 | -0.4% | Jun 09 | Dec 12 | 1.3 |
| Air to Air Refuel | 2,076.6 | 2,087.6 | 300.1 | 0.0 | -135.5 | -153.6 | -7.4% | Mar 11 | Qtr3 12 | 1.2 |
| C-17 Heavy Airlift | 1,864.4 | 2,054.8 | 190.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Dec 11 | Jan 11 | 0.8 |
| Hornet Upgrade | 1,300.0 | 2,041.6 | 488.5 | 221.5 | 35.0 | -3.4 | -0.3% | Aug 11 | Aug 11 | 1.0 |
| FFG Upgrade | 1,392.5 | 1,536.9 | 297.8 | 0.0 | -152.7 | -0.7 | -0.1% | Dec 05 | Dec 09 | 1.6 |
| Hornet Refurb | 156.6 | 937.8 | 108.7 | 673.5 | 0.0 | -1.0 | -0.6% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Bushranger | 295.0 | 930.7 | 120.3 | 515.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Apr 12 | Apr 12 | 1.0 |
| HF Modernisation | 505.0 | 660.6 | 150.1 | 11.0 | -4.7 | -0.8 | -0.2% | May 05 | 2016 | 2.2 |
| Armidales | 436.8 | 535.3 | 60.5 | 67.1 | -29.8 | 0.7 | 0.2% | Mar 09 | Dec 11 | 1.4 |
| Collins RCS | 455.3 | 458.6 | 5.0 | 0.0 | -0.9 | -0.8 | -0.2% | 2010 | 2016 | 1.8 |
| Total | 28,005.5 | 37,811.2 | 6,100.6 | 4,311.2 | -654.7 | 48.6 | 0.2% | - | - | 1.28 |
_______________________________________________________________________________
37 The ADF customer who will be the Capability Manager when equipment/ systems enter service.
38 'New' - a capability that has not previously existed in the ADF; 'Replacement' - a current capability that is being replaced by more up to date technology or to respond to a changing threat; 'Upgrade' - an upgrade to existing capabilities.
39 'Developmental' - Involving substantial design development and systems integration; 'MOTS/COTS' - Off-the-shelf equipment of Military or Commercial origin; and 'Australianised' MOTS/ COTS, an off-the-shelf design with significant levels of unique adaptation for Australian requirements.
40 The DMO's categorisation of projects that represent the complexity of the project on a sliding scale of 1 to 4, with ACAT 1 representing the most complex projects.
41 Provides an indication of whether the projects were initially developed under pre-or post Kinnaird reforms.
42 Provides an indication of maturity of a project based on the benchmark stage of a project.
43 Identifies the entity that has prime systems integrator responsibility for delivering mission and support systems for the project.
44 The portion of Second Pass budget approved by Government, transferred to the DMO under a MAA with Defence for delivery of the materiel system ($millions).
45 The current budget that takes account of all price indexation, foreign exchange and real variations from Second Pass Approval ($millions).
46 The total of price indexation and foreign exchange variations between the Current and 2nd Pass Approved budget ($millions), outside of the DMO's capacity to control.
47 The total of all approved quantity changes to the project's scope between the Current and 2nd Pass Approved budget ($millions).
48 The total of all transfers to and from other Defence Groups (i.e. Defence Support Group) and DMO projects ($millions).
49 The net variation after accounting for all price indexation, foreign exchange, scope change and transfer variations since the 2nd Pass Approved budget ($millions).
50 A schedule variance factor of 1 = on time; >1 = late; and <1 = early.
51 The significant scope increase for the MRH90 project is a result of Government decision to increase aircraft quantities from 12 to 46.