NOTES AND REFERENCES

1  In this paper, accountability is taken to mean the direct relationship of authority by which one party accounts to a person or body for the performance of tasks or functions conferred, or able to be conferred, by that person or body.

2  Howard, John the Hon. MP, Prime Minister 2001, Centenary of the APS Oration, Canberra, June.

3  ibid.

4  Management Advisory Committee, 2002, Australian Government use of information and communication technology, Canberra.

5  United Kingdom, Cabinet Office, Central IT Unit 1999, Modernising Government: Vision, London, p.1, [Online], Available: http://www.citu.gov.uk/modern ov/whitepaper/chap1.htm

6  Lewis, Mervyn K. 2002, Risk Management in Public Private Partnerships, National Australia Bank Professor, University of South Australia, Adelaide, p.1.

7  Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance 2000, Guiding Principles for Private Sector Participation in Public Infrastructure Provision, Appendix A, July, p. 28.

8  New South Wales Government 2001, Working with Government: Emerging PFP Opportunities, Sydney, November, p. 1.

9  These were the subjects of two Reports by the Audit Office of New South Wales: Private Participation in the Provision of Public Infrastructure: The Roads and Traffic Authority, 1994, and Roads and Traffic Authority: the M2 Motorway, 1995

10  For further discussion see, for example: Barrett P. 2000, What ' s New in Corporate Governance, Presentation by the Auditor-General for Australia to the CPA Australia, Annual Congress, 17 November, Available: http://www.anao.gov.au.

11  For example, the introduction of privately operated prisons in Victoria was considered in a performance audit undertaken by the Victorian Auditor-General's Office in 1999, Victoria's prison system: Community protection and prisoner welfare. Special Report 60, Melbourne, May.

12  National Commission of Audit, 1996, Report to the Commonwealth Government, AGPS, Canberra, June, p. 196.

13  Lewis, Mervyn K. 2002, op. cit., p.8.

14  UK National Audit Office 2001, Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 375 Session 2001-2002, 29 November, p.1.

15  For example, the Commonwealth Policy Principles for the Use of Private Financing released by the Minister for Finance and Administration in June 2002 identify transparency and accountability as two of the three core principles that are to guide the evaluation of private financing proposals. Similarly, the Victorian policy also requires an assessment of the impact of the project on accountability and transparency, with consideration of whether the partnership arrangements ensure that the community can be well informed about the obligations of the Government and the private sector partner, and that these can be over sighted by the Auditor-General: Partnerships Victoria, 2000, Melbourne, p.8.

16  Department of the Parliamentary Library 2002, Research Paper No. 1 2002-03, Public Private Partnerships: An Introduction, Canberra, September, p. 4.

17  Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance 2000, op. cit., p.4.

18  Minchin Nick The Hon., Minister for Finance and Administration 2002, Commonwealth Policy Principles For The Use of Private Financing, Canberra, June, p. 9.

19  ibid., p. 3.

20  NSW Public Accounts Committee 2002, Case Studies and Issues in the Private Financing of Public Infrastructure and Services, Report No.134, Sydney, October, p. 1.

21  Harris, A. C., New South Wales Auditor-General 1998, Credulity and Credibility in Infrastructure Funding, presented to "BOOT - In the Public Interest" Conference, Australian Centre for Independent Journalism and the University of Sydney Australian Mekong Resource Centre, University of Technology, 20 March.

22  Department of the Parliamentary Library 2002, op. cit. p. ii

23  Commonwealth Policy Principles For The Use of Private Financing 2002, op. cit. p. 9.

24  For example, the 1999 Ralph Review of Business Taxation recommended that section 51AD be abolished and that Division 16D be replaced: A New Tax System Redesigned, p. 392, quoted in Department of the Parliamentary Library 2002, op. cit. p. 18.

25  Coonan, Helen Senator The Hon., Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer 2002, Speech to AFR Infrastructure Summit, Melbourne, 15 August.

26  Commonwealth Policy Principles For The Use of Private Financing, op. cit. p. 9.

27  Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance 2000, Private Sector Participation in Public Infrastructure Provision: Policy Statement, Hobart, July, p.5.

28  Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance 2000, op. cit. p.16.

29  UK National Audit Office 2001, The Re-negotiation of the PFI-type deal for the Royal Armouries Museum in Leeds, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 103 Session 2000-2001, London, 18 January, p. 6.

30  Partnerships Victoria Guidance Material 2001, Risk Allocation and Contractual Issue- a guide, Melbourne, June, p.20.

31  NSW Public Accounts Committee 2001, Inquiry into the Funding of Capital Projects by the New South Wales Government: Parramatta Rail Link Pre-Tender Procurement - A Case Study, Report No.126, Sydney, January, p. 33.

32  Partnerships Victoria Guidance Materialop. cit. p. 8.

33  Lewis, Mervyn K. 2002, op. cit, p.9.

34  UK National Audit Office 2001, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: The Channel Tunnel Rail Link, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 302, Parliamentary Session 2000-2001, London, March.

35  ibid., pp.8-10.

36  Audit Office of New South Wales 1997, Review of Eastern Distributor, Sydney, July, p. 18.

37  ibid., p. 25.

38  Auditor-General's Office Victoria 1999, Report on Ministerial Portfolios, Melbourne, May, pp. 123-4.

39  UK National Audit Office 2002, Ministry of Defence: Redevelopment of MOD Main Building, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 748, Parliamentary Session 2001-2002, London, April, p. 2.

40  ibid., pp. 2-3

41  ibid., p. 3.

42  ANAO Audit Report No. 63 2001-02, Management of DASFLEET Tied Contract, Canberra, 26 June, pp.15-16.

43  ANAO Audit Report No. 25 1998-99, DAS Business Unit Sales - DASFLEET Sale, Canberra, 15 December.

44  AASB 2001, Project Summary: Public Infrastructure Disclosures, August, p. 1.

45  AASB 2002, Project Summary: Accounting for Service Concession Arrangements (formerly Public Infrastructure Disclosure), December, p.1.

46  ibid.

47  Department of the Parliamentary Library 2002, op. cit., p. ii

48  New South Wales Treasury Office of Financial Management 2002, Research & Information Paper, Private Provision of Public Infrastructure and Services, Sydney, April, p. 2.

49  South Australian Department of Treasury and Finance 2002, Partnerships SA - Private Sector Participation in the Provision of Public Services: Guidelines for the Private Sector, Adelaide, p.21.

50  Reith, Peter The Hon. MP, Minister for Defence 2001, Media Release Min 240/01, 8 July.

51  Hill, Robert Senator the Hon., Minister for Defence 2002, Media Release MIN 316/02, 28 June.

52  Flynn, Colin. 2000, The Real Role of Risk, Australasian Risk Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, March, p. 9.

53  For example, the Victorian policy, Partnerships Victoria (p. 8) and the Guidelines for Privately Financed Projects (p. 10) issued by the NSW Government both include a specific public interest test, incorporating a requirement for adequate accountability and transparency.

54  The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy 1995, Corporate Governance- A Framework for Public Service Bodies, CIPFA, London, July, p. 46

55  Barrett, P. 2002, Some Perspectives on the Audit Relationship with Parliament, Presentation by the Auditor-General for Australia, House of Representatives Occasional Seminar Series, 17 September, p.1

56  Commonwealth Policy Principles For The Use of Private Financing 2002, op. cit., p. 11.

57  Victorian Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2002, Issues Paper: Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector, Melbourne, April, p. 11.

58  ibid., pp. 13-14.

59  NSW Public Accounts Committee 2001, Inquiry into the Funding of Capital Projects by the New South Wales Government: Parramatta Rail Link Pre-Tender Procurement - A Case Study, Report No.126, Sydney, January, p. 31.

60  NSW Public Accounts Committee 2002, Case Studies and Issues in the Private Financing of Public Infrastructure and Services, Report No.134, Sydney, October, p. 1.

61  Victorian Auditor-General's Office 2002Report on Public Sector Agencies, June 2002, Melbourne, paragraph 3.7.

62  ibid., paragraph 3.9.

63  ibid., paragraphs 3.10-3.12.

64  ibid., paragraph 3.13.

65  ibid., paragraphs 3.14-3.17.

66  ibid., paragraph 3.23.

67  Department of the Parliamentary Library 2002, op. cit. p. 7.

68  UK National Audit Office, 2001, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: The Channel Tunnel Rail Link, op. cit., p.1.

69  ibid., p. 3

70  ibid.

71  Arthur Andersen and Enterprise LSE, 2000, Value for Money Drivers in the Private Financing Initiative, Report commissioned by The Treasury Task Force, London, January, pp.21-23

72  UK National Audit Office 1999, Examining the value for money of deals under the Private Financing Initiative, Appendix 2:'Risk Allocation", London, August, p. 64.

73  UK National Audit Office 2002, The Public Private Partnership for National Air Traffic Services Ltd, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 1096, Session 2001-2002, London, July, p. 1.

74  ibid.

75  ibid., p.43.

76  ibid.

77  The Economist, 1994, 'Watching the boss: A survey of corporate governance,' 29 January, p. 18. 

78  ANAO Audit Report No.11 2001-02, Administration of the Federation Fund Programme, Canberra, 19 September.

79  ibid., p.17

80  ibid.

81  Lewis, Mervyn K. 2002, op. cit., p.6.

82  In the 1996 Third Tranche Sale of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 30 per cent of selling commissions on sales to institutions were reserved for selling syndicate members with the remaining 70 per cent allocated among all stockbrokers according to how may shares they sold. In the 1997 Telstra Initial Public Share Offer, the competitive component of the commission in institutional sales was reduced to 60 per cent, meaning a higher proportion of commissions was allocated to brokers in the selling syndicate rather than rewarding selling performance.

83  ANAO Audit Report No. 10 1998-99, Sale of One-Third of Telstra, Canberra, 19 October.

84  Statement of Accounting Standard AAS21 1985, 'Accounting for the Acquisition of Assets (including Business Entities)'.

85  ANAO Audit Report No. 20 2000-01, Second Tranche Sale Telstra Shares, Canberra, 30 November.

86  ANAO Audit Report No. 4 2001-02, Commonwealth Estate Property Sales, Canberra, August.

87  ibid., p. 89.

88  Fahey, John The Hon, Minister for Finance and Administration 2001, Transcript, The World Today, 2 August.

89  Humphry, Richard 2000, Review of the Whole of Government Information Technology Initiative, Canberra, pp. 10, 13, 30, 31 and 32.

90  ANAO Audit Report No. 9 2000-01, Implementation of Whole-of-Government Information Technology Infrastructure Consolidation and Outsourcing Initiative. Canberra, 6 September, p. 177.

91  ibid. p. 171.

92  Humphry, Richard 2000, op. cit. p.10.

93  ibid.

94  Fahey, John The Hon 2001. Review of the Implementation of the Whole of Government Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, Media Statement, Canberra, 12 January.

95  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Re-booting the IT agenda in the Australian Public Service: Final Report on the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, August, p.xv.

96  ibid., p. xvi.

97  Industry Commission 1996, Competitive Tendering and Contracting by Public Sector Agencies, Report No.48, Melbourne, 24 January.

98  For example, ANAO Audit Report No. 10 1998-99, Sale of One-third of Telstra, concluded that, as an essential element of the outsourcing of project management for future Commonwealth public share offers, overall value for money could be improved by giving greater emphasis to financial issues when tendering for advisers; encouraging more competitive pressure on selling commissions and fees; paying fees only for services actually provided; and instituting a more effective and commercial approach to administering payment for shares by investors.

99  ANAO Audit Report No. 34 1999-2000, Construction of the National Museum of Australia and Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra, 16 March, p. 13.

100  ibid.

101  ibid.

102  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 1998, Contracting Out of Government Services, Second Report, The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, May.

103  Barrett, P. 2000, What's New in Corporate Governance, a presentation to the CPA Australia Annual Congress, Adelaide, 17 November, pp. 30-31.

104  O'Looney, J. A. 1998, Outsourcing State and Local Government Services - Decision- Making Strategies and Management Methods. Quorum Books, London, p. 147.

105  Industry Commission 1996, Competitive Tendering and Contracting by Public Sector Agencies, AGPS, Canberra, pp. 333-5.

106  Seddon, N. 1995, Government Contracts: Federal, State and Local, Federation Press, Sydney, p. 74.

107  OECD - Public Management Committee 1999, Performance Contracting, Lessons from Performance Contracting Case Studies, OECD, Paris, 17 November, p. 41.

108  ANAO Audit Report No. 24 1997-98, Matters Relevant to a Contract with South Pacific Cruise Lines Ltd, Canberra, 15 December.

109  ANAO Audit Report No. 34 1997-98, New Submarine Project, Canberra, 24 March.

110  ANAO Audit Report No. 24 1999-2000, Commonwealth Management and Regulation of Plasma Fractionation, Canberra, 22 December.

111  UK National Audit Office 2001, Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects, op. cit., p.1.

112  McIntosh, M. K. and Prescott, J. B. 1999, Report to the Minister for Defence on the Collins Class Submarine and Related Matters, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, p. 29.

113  Audit Review of Government Contracts 2000, Contracting, Privatisation, Probity and Disclosure in Victoria 1992-1999: An Independent Report to Government, Report, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne, May, p. 30.

114  ANAO Audit Report No. 63 2001-02, Management of DASFLEET Tied Contract, June, pp. 49-51.

115  ANAO Audit Report No. 9 2000-01, op. cit. p. 198.

116  ibid., p. 241.

117  Victorian Auditor-General's Office 1999, Victoria's prison system: Community protection and prisoner welfare, op. cit., paragraph 5.42-5.44.

118  Blake Dawson Waldron 2000, Canberra Notes-A Summary of Current Developments, Issue No. 1, January, pp. 13-14.

119  Kheir, Majed 2001, Diagnosing accountability and ensuring responsible corporate governance when outsourcing in the public sector, Address to IIR Conference 'Managing Risks When Outsourcing in the Public Sector', Canberra, 2 May, p. 8.

120  ibid.

121  ANAO Audit Report No. 9 2000-01, op. cit., p. 235.

122  ANAO Audit Report No. 9 2000-01, op. cit., p. 235.

123  Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit 2000, Contract Management in the Australian Public Service, Report 379, The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2 November.

124  ANAO Audit Report No.12 1999-2000, Management of Contracted Business Support Processes, Canberra, 14 October.

125  ANAO Audit Report No. 42 1999-2000, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Services- Effectiveness and Probity of the Policy Development Process and Implementation, Canberra, 10 May.

126  ANAO Audit Report No. 14 2002-03, Health Group IT Outsourcing Tender Process, Canberra, 29 October, p. 31.

127  ibid.

128  ANAO Audit Report No. 45 2001-02, Recordkeeping, Canberra, May.

129  Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit 2001, Review of the Auditor-General Act 1997, Report No. 386, Canberra, August, quoted in Barrett, P. 2002, Some Perspectives on the Audit Relationship with Parliament, op. cit., p.4.

130  Commonwealth Policy Principles For The Use of Private Financing, op. cit., p. 11.

131  Stewart, Dr Jenny 2001, Hands off the Auditor!, in the Public Sector Informer, Canberra, October, p. 6.

132  Australasian Council of Auditors-General 1997, Statement of Principles: Commercial Confidentiality and the Public Interest, Canberra, November.

133  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Accountability in a Commercial Environment - Emerging Issues, Interim Report, Inquiry into the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, April, p.21.

134  Freedom of Information Act 1982, section 43.

135  de Maria, W 2001, Commercial-in-Confidence: An Obituary to Transparency?, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 60, no. 4, p.93.

136  Barrett, P. 2002, Some Perspectives on the Audit Relationship with Parliament, op. cit., p.10.

137  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, op. cit., pp. 159-160.

138  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Re-booting the IT agenda in the Australian Public Service, Government Senators' Minority Report, Final Report on the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, August, p.240.

139  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Accountability in a Commercial Environment - Emerging Issues, op. cit., p.26

140  Australasian Council of Auditors-General 1997, op. cit.

141  The audit sought to: assess the extent of guidance on the use of confidentiality clauses in the context of contracts at a government wide level or within selected agencies; develop criteria that could be used to determine whether information in (or in relation to) a contract is confidential, and what limits should apply; assess the appropriateness of agencies' use of confidentiality clauses in the context of contracts to cover information relating to contracted provisions of goods and services, and the implications of existing practices of applying the criteria that have been developed; and assess the effectiveness of the existing accountability and disclosure arrangements for the transparency of contracts entered into by the Commonwealth, and whether agencies are complying with the arrangements: ANAO Audit Report No 38 2000-01, The Use of Confidentiality Provisions in Commonwealth Contracts., Canberra, 24 May, p. 13.

142  ibid., p. 15.

143  ibid., p. 55-60.

144  ibid., p. 64. The following types of information in, or in relation to, contracts would generally not be considered to be confidential:

  performance and financial guarantees;

  indemnities;

  the price of an individual item, or groups of items of goods or services;

  rebate, liquidated damages and service credit clauses;

  clauses which describe how intellectual property rights are to be dealt with; and

  payment arrangements.

145  ibid., p. 65. The following types of information may meet the criteria of being protected as confidential information:

  trade secrets;

  proprietary information of contractors (this could be information about how a particular technical or business solution is to be provided);

  a contractor's internal costing information or information about its profit margins;

  pricing structures (where this information would reveal whether a contractor was making a profit or loss on the supply of a particular good or service); and

  intellectual property matters where these relate to a contractor's competitive position.

146  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Commonwealth Contracts: A New Framework for Accountability, Final Report on the Inquiry into the Mechanism for Providing Accountability to the Senate in relation to Government Contracts, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, September (See Appendix A).

147  ANAO Audit Report No. 8 2002-03, The Senate Order for Department and Agency Contracts (September 2002), Canberra, September, p. 12.

148  ANAO Audit Report No. 33 2001-02, Senate Order of 20 June 2001(February 2002), Canberra, February and ANAO Audit Report No. 8 2002-03, The Senate Order for Department and Agency Contracts (September 2002), Canberra, September.

149  ANAO Audit Report No. 8 2002-03, op. cit., p. 15.

150  ibid., p. 16.

151  Dr Nick Seddon, quoted in Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Inquiry into the Mechanism for Providing Accountability to the Senate in relation to Government Contracts, op. cit. p.4.

152  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2002, Departmental and agency contracts: Report on the first year of operation of the Senate Order for the production of lists of departmental and agency contracts, Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra, December.

153  ibid., p. 33. 

154  ibid., pp. 36-51.

155  Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance, 2000, op cit. p. 9.

156  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Inquiry into the Mechanism for Providing Accountability to the Senate in relation to Government Contracts, op. cit. p.8.

157  The Victorian Public Accounts and Estimates Committee had earlier also endorsed the view that the decision as to whether or not to disclose commercially sensitive information should be made according to the general principle that information should be made public unless there is a justifiable reason for withholding access to it; Inquiry into Commercial in Confidence Material and the Public Interest, 35th Report to Parliament, Melbourne, March 2000, p. xxxi.

158  New South Wales Government 2001, Working with Government: Policy for Privately Financed Projects, Sydney, November, p. 2.

159  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Inquiry into the Mechanism for Providing Accountability to the Senate in relation to Government Contracts, op. cit., p.8.

160  Audit Office of New South Wales 1999, Contracting Out Review Guide, Sydney, June, p.1.

161  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Inquiry into the Mechanism for Providing Accountability to the Senate in relation to Government Contracts, op. cit., p.5.

162  ibid., p.7.

163  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, op. cit, p.164.

164  Audit Office of New South Wales 1995, Roads and Traffic Authority: The M2 Motorway, Sydney, January, p. 3.

165  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, op. cit. p.167.

166  For example, Section 50 of the Australian Constitution empowers the Senate to delegate to committees certain powers to conduct inquiries. The Senate Standing Orders, the Senate's rules for the conduct of its proceedings made in accordance with Section 50 of the Constitution, confer on committees the power to invite the attendance of a person or the production of a document, and if that invitation is declined, to require the attendance of that person, or that document.

167  Egan vs Willis and Egan vs Chadwick & Ors, referenced in Sendt, B. NSW Auditor- General 2002, Keeping Governments Accountable: The Taxpayer's Right to Know, Presentation at Seminar, Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand, 25 March.

168  Odgers' Australian Senate Practice, 10th Edition, 2001, p. 398: Odgers' identifies the two qualifications as: there is probably an implicit limitation on the power of the Senate to summon members of the other House or of a state or territory legislature, and this limitation may extend also to all state officers. It may also be held that the investigatory power of committees is limited to matters within Commonwealth legislative power as delineated by the Constitution. Neither possible limitation has been adjudicated.

169  Odgers' Australian Senate Practice, op. cit., p. 398.

170  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Inquiry into the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative: Accountability Issues, Two Case Studies, The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, June, p. 31.

171  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, op. cit. p. 166.

172  ibid., p.167.

173  Odgers' Australian Senate Practice, op. cit., p. 482.

174  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee, Final Report on the Government's Information Technology Outsourcing Initiative, op. cit., p.157.

175  ibid., p.6. 

176  ibid.,

177  ibid., p.168.

178  Australasian Council of Auditors-General 1997, op. cit.

179  Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines, September 2001, subsection 1.2.

180  Commonwealth Policy Principles For The Use of Private Financing, op. cit., p. 11.

181  ibid.

182  Australasian Council of Auditors-General 1997, op. cit.

183  Confidence Material and the Public Interest, op. cit.

184  Victorian Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2000, Inquiry into Commercial in Confidence Material and the Public Interest, op. cit.

185  ibid., pp. xix and. 80-81.

186  Section 37(2) of the Auditor-General Act 1997 sets out the following reasons for non disclosure of information in the public interest:

(a)  it would prejudice the security, defence or international relations of the Commonwealth;

(b)  it would involve the disclosure of deliberations or decisions of the Cabinet or of a Committee of the Cabinet;

(c)  it would prejudice relations between the Commonwealth and a State;

(d)  it would divulge any information or matter that was communicated in confidence by the Commonwealth to a State, or by a State to the Commonwealth;

(e)  it would unfairly prejudice the commercial interests of any body or person;

(f)  any other reason that could form the basis for a claim by the Crown in right of the Commonwealth in a judicial proceeding that the information should not be disclosed.

187  Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee 2001, Final Report on the Inquiry into the Mechanism for Providing Accountability to the Senate in relation to Government Contracts, op. cit., p.7.

188  Mulgan, Richard 2000, Comparing Accountability in the Public and Private Sectors, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol.59, No.1, March, p. 96.

189  Hughes, Owen E. 1998, Public Management and Administration - An Introduction, Second Edition, Macmillan Education Australia, Melbourne, p. 229.

190  Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee 2000, Report on 1998- 99 Annual Reports, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, March, p. 9.

191  Harris, A. C., New South Wales Auditor-General 1998, Accountability and Commercialisation in the Public Sector, presented to CPA Congress '98, Technical Session 31, Tuesday 13 October.