3.2  Contractor Test and Evaluation Progress

Test and Evaluation

Major System/ Platform Variant

Original Planned

Current Planned

Achieved/ Forecast

Variance (Months)

System Integration

Instrument Landing System Antennae Qualification

Jul 08

 

May 09

10

Instrument Landing System - Aircraft

Integration Test

Jan 09 -

Mar 09

 

May 09 -

June 09

3

Aircraft Software Integration

Mar 09 -

Jul 09

 

Mar 09 -

Dec 09

5

Electronic Warfare Data Library

Mar 09

 

May 10

14

Automated Maintenance Environment

Aug 09

 

Aug 09

0

Acceptance

Lot 32 Aircraft Production Test (Boeing) - 12 Aircraft

Jul 09 -

May 10

 

Jul 09 -

May 10

0

Lot 33 Aircraft Production Test (Boeing) - 12 Aircraft

Aug 10 -

Jul 11

 

Aug 10 -

Jul 11

0

Aircraft Post-Production Test and Evaluation (US Navy)

Jul 09 -

Oct 09

 

Jul 09 -

Nov 10

8 - Note

1

Electronic Warfare Data Library

May 09

 

Jun 10

13 - Note

2

Automated Maintenance Environment

Aug 09

 

Aug 09

0

Tactical Operation Flight Trainers #1 (On-Site Test)

Mar 10

 

May 10

2 - Note

3

Low Cost Trainers

Feb 10

 

May 10

3 - Note

4

Visual Environment Maintenance Trainers

Sept 09

 

Oct 09

1 - Note

5

Computer Based Training Classrooms

Nov 09

 

Dec 09

0

Variance Explanations

•  Instrument Landing System antennae qualification and integration tests delayed due to a test failures of the antennas and the need to redesign.

•  Airframe Integration Test - Slip due to failure of Instrument Landing System antennae,

•  Software Integration - classified.

•  The Electronic Warfare data library testing was delayed due to the US Navy adopting a new design process, and the continuing issue of classified data being unable to be released.

•  Note 1 - Post-production test and evaluation affected by the delays in the instrumented landing system qualification and aircraft software integration. The eight month delay relates to the first aircraft which will remain in the US for Contractor rectification testing with the avionics issue and Weapon risk mitigation activity.

•  Note 2 - 13 month delay due to System Integration failures and delays with USN development

•  Note 3 - two month variance due to delays in the US Government data release approval process and approval required for US export of equipment.

•  Note 4 - three month delay due to late delivery of Low Cost Trainer facility at Amberley.

•  Note 5 - one month variance due to delays in the US Government data release approval process and approval required for US export of equipment.