1.6 Project Maturity Score and Benchmark
| Maturity Score | Attributes | Total | |||||||
| Schedule | Cost | Requirement | Technical Understanding | Technical Difficulty | Commercial | Operations and Support | |||
| Project Stage: Critical Design Review | Benchmark | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 50 |
| Current Project | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 49 | |
| Explanation | • Schedule - critical path activities are well advanced and detailed planning for remaining activities is sound. Variance trends provide confidence that schedule will be within the tolerance of the Materiel Acquisition Agreement. • Requirement - Generally the requirement is being realised, however there are some areas where further assessment and stakeholder engagement is required. • Technical Understanding - The completion of the Detailed Design Reviews provided additional clarity and definition to the integration complexity. As a result a Close Out Review was implemented and conducted in June 2010 to clarify technical detail with whole of ship integration. • Commercial - Contractor is performing and delivering as contracted. • Operations and Support - Procurement of training and spares yet to be contracted. | ||||||||
| Project Stage | Total Benchmark Score | Total Current Score | |
| Critical Design Review | 50 | 49 | |
|
| |||
