1.6 Project Maturity Score and Benchmark
|
| Attributes | ||||||||
| Maturity Score | Schedule | Cost | Requirement | Technical Understanding | Technical Difficulty | Commercial | Operations and Support | Total | |
| Project Stage: | Benchmark | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 55 |
| System Integration and Test | Current Project | 6 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 55 |
| Explanation | • Schedule: The difference is a result of delays specifically associated with the Certification and subsequent FOC for Interim Anchoring Capability - now scheduled for Q4 2010. | ||||||||
| • Cost: The main cost component of the project, the WGS 6 satellite, is more than half complete and is forecast to be produced under budget. | |||||||||
| • Requirement: Three satellites are in orbit and two are being used operationally providing a known understanding of the capability to be provided by the constellation. | |||||||||
| • Operations and Support: Interim Anchoring will enter service and provide operational capability later than expected. | |||||||||
| Project Stage | Total Benchmark Score | Total current Score |
| System Integration and Test | 55 | 55 |
|
| ||
