8.1 The Authority will consider in good faith High Value Change Stage 2 Submissions submitted by Project Co and the Authority will not unreasonably withhold or delay its consent to a High Value Change Stage 2 Submission. The Authority is entitled to call for such reasonable information and assistance as it considers appropriate to enable it to decide whether the High Value Change Stage 2 Submission meets the Approval Criteria. Project Co must reply promptly to all such requests for further information and assistance.
8.2 As soon as reasonably practicable after the submission to it of a High Value Change Stage 2 Submission (including any revised High Value Change Stage 2 Submission re-submitted by Project Co) the Authority must give written notice of whether it:
8.2.1 approves the relevant Stage 1 Approved Project (in which case the Stage 1 Approved Project will be referred to as having received "Stage 2 Approval" or as being a "Stage 2 Approved Project" or an "Approved Project" as the context requires); or
8.2.2 rejects the Stage 1 Approved Project:
(a) on the ground that the High Value Change Stage 2 Submission in relation to the relevant Stage 1 Approved Project has failed to meet one or more of the Approval Criteria (except as referred to in paragraph 8.2.2(b)(i) or paragraph 8.2.2(b)(ii)), in which case (subject to resubmission under paragraph 8.2.3) paragraph 8.3 shall apply;
(b)
(i) because, as a result of any change to the Target Cost referred to in paragraph 2.1.2, the Stage 1 Approved Project is not in fact Affordable despite the High Value Change Stage 2 Submission being within the Target Cost notified by the Authority pursuant to paragraph 2.1.2 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes); or
(ii) because Project Co has failed to meet one or more of the Approval Criteria and the sole reason for that failure is that any Necessary Consent identified by Project Co (in compliance with paragraph 3.4.12 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes)) has not been obtained; or
(iii) otherwise on grounds other than those set out in paragraphs 8.2.2(a), 8.2.2(b)(i) and 8.2.2(b)(ii) of this Section 4 (High Value Changes),
in which case paragraph 8.5 shall apply.
8.2.3 If the Authority rejects the High Value Change Stage 2 Submission on the grounds set out in paragraph 8.2.2(a) the Authority and Project Co will work together to address the reasons for such failure and attempt in good faith to produce a revised High Value Change Stage 2 Submission for Project Co to re-submit to the Authority.
8.2.4 If:
(a) a resubmitted High Value Change Stage 2 Submission is rejected by the Authority on the ground set out in paragraph 8.2.2(a) (subject to paragraphs 16.3 to 16.4 (if applicable) of this Section 4 (High Value Changes)); or
(b) no resubmission of the High Value Change Stage 2 Submission is made within 30 Business Days of the date of the notice of rejection (or such longer period as the parties may agree),
then the relevant Stage 1 Approved Project shall be treated as having been properly rejected, the provisions of paragraph 8.3 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes) shall apply and neither the Authority nor Project Co will have any further obligations in relation to the relevant High Value Change referred to in the High Value Change Stage 2 Submission.
If a High Value Change Stage 2 Submission is properly rejected by the Authority
8.3 Where this paragraph 8.3 applies (as set out in paragraph 8.2.2(a), paragraph 8.2.4 and paragraph 16.4.2 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes)) the Authority shall not be required to reimburse or compensate Project Co in respect of any costs relating to the High Value Change including the Change Management Fee.
8.4 If:
8.4.1 Project Co fails to provide a response to an Authority Change Notice in accordance with paragraph 3.1 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes); or
8.4.2 (where applicable) Project Co fails to provide a High Value Change Proposal in accordance with paragraph 3.4 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes); or
8.4.3 Project Co fails to submit a High Value Change Stage 2 Submission in accordance with paragraph 4.1.2 of Section 4 (High Value Changes); or
8.4.4 the Authority has validly rejected a High Value Change Stage 2 Submission in accordance with paragraph 8.2 and the matter has not been referred to the Dispute Resolution Procedure or any such dispute has been determined as described in paragraph 16.4.2 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes),
then, subject to paragraph 17 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes), the Authority may notify Project Co that the High Value Change Notice is withdrawn and, following such notification, may procure the implementation of the High Value Change without further recourse to Project Co, but the Authority must ensure that the High Value Change is carried out in accordance with Good Industry Practice and to the standards that would have applied to Project Co if it had implemented the High Value Change.
If a High Value Change Stage 2 Submission is improperly rejected by the Authority
8.5 Where this paragraph 8.5 applies (as set out in paragraph 5.2.1(b), paragraph 5.2.2 paragraph 8.2.2(b) and paragraph 16.4.1)), the Incurred Change Management Fee and Third Party Costs incurred by Project Co to prepare the High Value Change Proposal and Stage 2 Submission, which shall be in accordance with the activities and budget referred to in paragraph 3.4.4 of this Section 4 (High Value Changes), in relation to the relevant High Value Change will be paid by the Authority within ten (10) Business Days of the date on which Project Co receives written notice of the rejection or the date of the deemed rejection (as the case may be) with the date of the rejection or the deemed rejection (as the case may be) being the Calculation Date for the purposes of calculating the amount of the Incurred Change Management Fee (unless a different Calculation Date is expressly stated in this Section 4 (High Value Changes) in relation to the circumstances giving rise to the entitlement of Project Co to be paid the Incurred Change Management Fee).