1. DEFINITIONS
In each part of this Schedule 26 (Planning) the following expressions (in addition to those specified in Schedule 1 (Definitions) shall, save where the context or the express provisions of this Contract otherwise requires or admits, have the following meanings
means [to be settled on a project by project basis];198 | |
means any required enhancement to the Design Proposal in respect of the following: [to be agreed on a project specific basis]199 | |
means the expiry of the later of: (a) the period prescribed by [statute] during which a third party may institute a challenge which could result in the quashing or modification of the relevant decision of the Planning Authority; and (b) where such a challenge is initiated within the period in (a) above the period up to and including the final determination or withdrawal of that challenge plus five (5) Business Days; | |
means any failure to determine a Planning Application by the Planning Authority within the statutory period which would entitle the Contractor to appeal against the deemed refusal of that Planning Application or any other period which the Contractor and the Planning Authority may agree shall constitute the period for determination of the Planning Application for the purposes of any appeal by the Contractor; | |
means in relation to the relevant Facility, the design proposals for the Facility set out in [Schedule 29 (Design Proposal)] and developed pursuant to paragraph 3.9;200 | |
means proceedings brought under Part 54 of the Civil Procedure Rules or by any party other than the Contractor under Section 288 of the Planning Act in respect of the Planning Permission; | |
means counsel experienced in town and country planning matters and practising at the town and country planning bar who: (a) shall be agreed upon by the Parties or, in default of agreement shall be of 15 years' call and identified by the Chairman of the Planning and Environmental Bar Association or his deputy; and (b) accepts instructions to provide an opinion pursuant to paragraph 2 (Planning Consents); | |
means any costs or expenses, relating to land outside the [specify relevant facility] incurred in order to comply with or fulfil any requirement or obligation or condition of any Planning Permission, associated Planning Agreement or agreement with any highway authority having a value in excess of [£[ ]]; | |
means any works, relating to land outside the [specify relevant facility] in order to comply with or fulfil any requirement or obligation or condition of any Planning Permission, associated Planning Agreement or agreement with any highway authority; | |
means: (a) Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990; (b) Section 38 or 278 Highways Act 1980; (c) Section 104 Water Industry Act 1991 or any other provision of a similar intent within the meaning of the Water Act 1989, with an appropriate authority for the supply of water or the drainage of foul water from the Site; | |
means in respect of the Facility, the date as set out in Schedule 8 (Key Dates); | |
means a Planning Permission with the Challenge Period expired (and with any Proceedings having finally been determined such that the Planning Permission has been upheld and may be implemented)201 for [specify facility], together with any associated Planning Agreement or agreement with any Relevant Authority which is a permission for the description of the development202 which is the subject of the agreed Planning Application for the [specify facility] and does not impose on the Contractor by way of condition or other obligation any of the following requirements: | |
(a) a requirement to obtain the agreement of a third party other than [to be specified] in respect of land outside the [specify facility] other than: | |
(i) statutory undertakers in respect of any utility; and (ii) a highway authority; | |
(b) a requirement to carry out Off-Site Works or incur Off-Site Expenditure other than [exclusions to be negotiated on a project specific basis]; | |
(c) a requirement which renders the Contractor unable to deliver or perform all or any of the Services as are to be provided at the [specify facility] in accordance with the Authority's Requirements or Service Delivery Plan at [facility] but only to the extent it has one or more of the following effects: | |
[to be agreed on a project specific basis. The definition ought not to be too narrow so Bidders are encouraged to ensure flexibility. References to "Base Case" will need to be refined but are included here to demonstrate an appreciation that the Planning Permission will need to deliver the Contractor's assumptions in relation to Third Party Waste, if applicable] | |
(i) [prevents the [facility] from operating in accordance with the Authority's Requirements and the Service Delivery Plan; (ii) restricts the number of waste carrying vehicle movements to and from the Site to less than the minimum inward movements of waste carrying vehicles per day as set out in [ ] of the Service Delivery Plan or Base Case; | |
(iii) restricts access to the public otherwise than as set out in the Service Delivery Plan; (iv) requires that any Contract Waste will be delivered otherwise than by [road going vehicles alone]; | |
(v) restricts the hours of delivery of Contract Waste to the Site otherwise than as set out in the Service Delivery Plan; (vi) causes the Contractor to be in breach of the [Environmental Permit]; | |
(vii) limits the life of the planning permission granted for the [Facility] to less than the period from the date that the planning permission is granted until the original Expiry Date; and (viii) [restricts tonnage levels of Contract Waste to be received and/or processed at the Site otherwise than as set out in the Service Delivery Plan or Base Case203;] | |
and an "Unsatisfactory Planning Permission" is one which is not a Satisfactory Planning Permission [provided that where any of the requirements covered by limbs (i) to (viii) above can by covered by a Planning Contingency204 then such requirement or requirements shall not constitute an Unsatisfactory Planning Permission where such requirement has a financial impact only]; |
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
198 Depending on the Authority's view of the planning risk associated with the project (and subject to budgetary issues for the Authority if amounts in excess of the Appeal Contingency become payable), it may be better value for money for the Appeal Contingency to be a nominal amount to cover minor challenges or appeals that do not proceed (say, £10,000) but this should be considered by Authorities on a case by case basis. Where the Schedule 27 (Approach to Permit Risk) is also included, the contingency amounts should be combined. If the Appeal Contingency is set beyond a nominal amount and it is clear that it is priced on a £ for £ basis, the Parties should consider a mechanism to reduce the Unitary Charge to the extent that the Appeal Contingency is not used.
199 The definition of Architectural Enhancement is to be settled on a project specific basis and should reflect that this mechanism is intended to protect the Contractor from material enhancements that have not been taken into account by the Contractor in its Design Proposals and Base Case and that cannot be mitigated (eg a requirement to sink a Facility). Authorities will need to be satisfied before Financial Close that the Contractor has developed its Design Proposals taking into account all relevant planning policy and discussions with the relevant Planning Authority.
200 The Design Proposal should take account of the guide issued by Defra entitled "Designing Waste Facilities - a guide to modern design in waste".
201 To be considered in dialogue whether Challenge Period is to expire before the Planning Permission is considered satisfactory.
202 It is sometimes proposed that the Designs are included in the definition of Satisfactory Planning Permission. However, if that is the case, Authorities will have to be certain they have been prepared in accordance with Good industry Practice. In most cases, the Contractor ought to be sufficiently protected by the concept of Architectural Enhancements provided it is adequately defined.
203 To be considered on a project specific basis, for example, where the facility is significantly oversized then this risk may be appropriately considered to be the Contractor's risk.
204 It is for Authorities to determine whether a "Planning Contingency" is value for money. If a Planning Contingency is required, a definition will be required and provision should be made to strip it out if it is not required. Generally, a Planning Contingency will only be useful where there is a specific and quantifiable planning concern that has not been resolved at Financial Close and which the parties are genuinely unable to determine will be a planning requirement or otherwise.