Conclusion on value for money

18  This report looks at the value for money achieved by hospital PFI contracts once they are operational. We found that most PFI hospital contracts are well managed. And the low level of deductions and high levels of satisfaction indicate they are currently achieving the value for money expected at the point the contracts were signed. However, as the cost and performance of hotel services are similar to those in non-PFI hospitals there is no evidence that including these services in a PFI contract is better or worse value for money than managing them separately.

19  There continues to be risks to the long-term value for money from these contracts. Managing the contracts is complex. The long-term service commitments of PFI contracts and the Trusts' approach to managing the contracts has limited Trusts' ability to make efficiency savings from certain areas of the contract, and to drive continuous service improvement. Investors and contractors will naturally seek to maximise their profit margins, and we have seen examples where this is at the expense of the Trust. Limitations in performance and cost data restrict the Department's support to Trusts and increase the risk of value for money being eroded over time.