APPENDIX TWO Timeline of events

Oct 2001

Home Secretary announced major overhaul of the asylum system. Strategic business case for accommodation centres submitted to HM Treasury.

Feb 2002

Home Office issued OJEC notice and subsequently staged a bidders conference.

May 2002

Public announcement regarding the Bicester site. Home Office submitted planning application to Cherwell District Council. Pre-Qualification Questionnaires issued to 21 prospective bidders.

June 2002

Public consultation on the planning application by the Council.

July 2002

The Council objected to the planning notification. The Home Office selected five consortiums to bid for the project.

Aug 2002

Department announced appeal against the Council's objection.

Nov 2002

The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 passed. Bicester business case approved by the Home Office and Gateway 2 Review held.

Dec 2002 - Mar 2003

Local planning inquiry held.

July 2003

Gateway 2a Review held. Preferred Bidder selection process began. HM Treasury confirmed £116 million capital budget available for the accommodation centres project from 2003 to 2006.

Aug 2003

Secretary of State for Local Government and the Regions granted planning approval for Bicester.

Sept 2003

The three bidding consortiums submitted Final Invitation to Negotiate responses for evaluation.

Oct 2003

The Council sought judicial review.

Dec 2003

Gateway 3 Review held.

Jan 2004

Global Solutions Limited selected as preferred bidder. Bicester business case prepared for Home Office Group Investment Board.

Feb 2004

Bicester business case submitted to Home Office Group Investment Board.

Mar 2004

Judicial review hearing held.

April 2004

Judicial review rejected the Council's planning challenge. Council to appeal.

May 2004

Full business case resubmitted to Group Investment Board with results of the benefits realisation exercise included.

June 2004

Home Office signed main works contract with preferred bidder.

July 2004

Court of Appeal hearing held.

Sept 2004

The Home Office began development of the new asylum model.

Oct 2004

Court of Appeal upheld Secretary of State's decision.

Nov 2004

Council announced it would not appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision. Home Office submitted the detailed planning application to the Council.

Jan 2005

Home Office Finance Director notified by project team that the capital cost of Bicester has increased by 13 per cent since February 2004.

Feb 2005

The Council resolved to object to the detailed planning application. Ministers advised of project capital cost increases.

April 2005

Senior Responsible Officer advised Accounting Officer and ministers that Bicester was no longer economically viable.

June 2005

Immigration Minister announced that the network of ten centres would not go ahead and a few days later that the Home Office would not be proceeding with Bicester.