2.25 Given that the project has only been underway for four years, it is difficult to make a firm judgement on whether the project is likely to meet its long-term objective of creating a sustainable community on the Peninsula. We therefore looked at whether the necessary elements for building a sustainable community are in place, or are accounted for in the project's plans. Our expert panel advised us on the criteria used for evaluating "placemaking" which form the basis of this investigation. Figure 9 shows a summary of the results of our assessment presented as 'traffic light' indicators. More detail about the assessment is given at Appendix 2.
9 | Early indicators suggest the project has the potential to create a sustainable community | ||
Sustainability key criteria | Traffic light indicator |
| |
Developers and other key parties committed to forming a sustainable community |
|
| |
Buildings are environmentally friendly and of good quality |
|
| |
Reasonable provision of affordable housing |
|
| |
A mix of types of housing for different people and tenures |
|
| |
Enough houses will be built and sold or rented to form a sustainable community |
|
| |
A sound and diverse economic base |
|
| |
Adequate provision of shops, retail, leisure outlets, etc. |
|
| |
Adequate and diverse transport provision |
|
| |
Adequate provision of utilities |
|
| |
Good schools |
|
| |
Good health care, good community social care |
|
| |
Clean safe environment, low crime and anti-social behaviour |
|
| |
Successful management of flood risk |
|
| |
Reasonable provision of green spaces and recreational areas |
|
| |
Measures to work towards carbon neutrality |
|
| |
Consultation of the community in the development and outside |
|
| |
Arrangements for the community to govern itself and for management of the estate |
|
| |
Measures to create a sense of community identity and a brand for the development |
|
| |
Good leisure and cultural facilities |
|
| |
An iconic building or feature to act as a focus of the community |
|
| |
| Key |
|
|
| Significant risk criterion may not be met |
|
|
| Not yet clear project will meet criterion |
|
|
| Project has plans in place to meet criterion |
|
|
Source: Advice from National Audit Office Expert Panel; National Audit Office evaluation of data and plans of principal bodies involved with the project | |||
2.26 Our assessment is not a prediction about what will happen against each of the criteria. It presumes that current plans are delivered in full in a timely fashion and that these new challenges are addressed as they arise.