24. In offering a price for Airwave, 02 assumed that other organisations would join the service and modelled the probable additional income. 02's financial modelling had indicated additional revenues of between £1.8 million and £5.5 million a year, which had been taken into account in the negotiations with PITO. Nevertheless, under the contract with 02, the Home Office will not get anything back if higher than expected numbers of sharers join the system. The deal with 02 was that it would take the risk if sharers fell below what it was expecting and would take all the gain from a higher than expected number of extra users. The size of any gains would depend on the deals struck with the sharers, most of whom were likely to be publicly funded services (Figure 4).22
| Figure 4: Potential extra users of Airwave | |
| Civilian Emergency Services | Ministry of Defence Organisations |
| Other public safety and emergency response services | |
| CCTV control rooms (under certain circumstances) | Traffic Wardens |
source: C&AG's Report
25. In response to a question on whether Airwave would generate further income from sales to other countries, 02 explained that its approach was to deliver the service in the UK, establish a track record and then look to expand into other areas. A number of countries in Europe had committed to the TETRA standard but had not yet chosen a particular service provider. The same was true in other parts of the world, such as Africa and Australasia. From 02's perspective, overseas sales were a possibility but only once Airwave had been successfully delivered in the UK. 02 had been prepared to discuss sharing the rewards from other parties if the Home Office could bring those other organisations on board. For its part, the Home Office would have liked to have achieved a better deal on sharing the rewards from the wider use of Airwave, but was unable to move 02 during the commercial negotiations.23
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
22 C&AG's Report, para 1.35; Qq 78, 80