Professional
Risk No. | Professional | Programme Risk | Consequences of Risk | Assessment of Risk | Owner | Action Plan | Target Date | ||
Probability | Impact | ||||||||
PF1 |
| Differing values and cultures are recognised but prove insurmountable | Partners are unable to reach agreement regarding priorities and deliverables. Partners have differing expectations. | 2 | 3 | 6 | Establish Change Management structure and plan - ensure effective stakeholder communications |
| |
PF2 |
| Failure to maintain existing customer expectations | Existing customers seek to withdraw from current arrangements impacting on business case viability. | 1 | 3 | 3 | Build affordability on core offer |
| |
PF3 |
| Lack of staff buy-in | Resistance to changes that are discussed/proposed leading to industrial action Increased staff turnover/ retention of key staff. | 2 | 3 | 6 | Ensure effective 2-way communication and active engagement of staff and representative bodies in shaping the solutions / selecting the partner |
| |
PF4 |
| Project workload exceeds available resources. | Timetable is not achieved. Lack of proper engagement with stakeholders and poor preparation of key documentation | 1 | 3 | 3 | Programme Planning and management |
| |
PF5 |
| Lack of strong and integrated project management disciplines and programme management | Project gets out of control. Choose the wrong partner as a result lack of control | 1 | 2 | 2 | Programme Planning. Use experience of others to ascertain what has worked well before and cut down on process re-invention - adopt OGC programme management principles |
| |
PF6 |
| Project lacks any formal Contingency Plan or withdrawal strategy | I.e. Contingency should a partner not be found | 1 | 2 | 2 | Include a checkpoint in the Programme Plan post-OJEU to review the requirement for a Contingency Plan |
| |