Reputational
Risk No. | Reputational | Programme Risk | Consequences of Risk | Assessment of Risk | Owner | Action Plan | Target Date | ||
Probability | Impact |
| |||||||
R1 |
| Failure to make partnership proposals commercially attractive to the market | Inability to attract commercially/professionally sound partners. | 2 | 2 | 4 | Evaluate existing examples of partnering in market Gain independent review in the preparation of proposals. Soft market test proposals with suppliers |
| |
R2 |
| Failure to maintain business as usual during transition (service continuity) | Existing service delivery standards fall resulting in low customer satisfaction. | 2 | 3 | 6 | Evaluate partner's Change Management plan and capability. Evaluate appetite for change and ensure leaders have Change Management skills |
| |
R3 |
| Cross authority senior management commitment to the Project is not sustained | Loss of credibility of management to implement change | 2 | 3 | 6 | Review and monitor stakeholder engagement |
| |
R4 |
| Agreed timetable for procuring the partner becomes unsustainable | Benefits realisation is delayed | 2 | 2 | 4 | Programme Management & Planning, monitoring of Plan and re-alignment of resources to meet pressure points. |
| |
R5 |
| Key stakeholders lose confidence | Loss of credibility. Loss of business and revenue. | 1 | 3 | 3 | Change Management Group to monitor. |
| |
R6 |
| Programme objectives agreed at the outset but support is not sustained | Failure to realise the benefits. The underlying business need for undertaking the Programme is unclear or misunderstood. | 2 | 3 | 6 | Regular and open review of objectives to ensure they remain in line with political and senior management aspirations. |
| |
R7 |
| Failure to reach common understanding regarding programme benefits | Impacts on ability to effectively seek a partner. Confused messages to staff. Confusion for Stakeholders Lack of understanding & failure to attract the market The Programme has an over optimistic view of the benefits profile for a strategic service delivery partnership | 2 | 3 | 6 | Establish clear benefits realisation plan and manage stakeholder engagement in its development and promotion |
| |
R8 |
| Failure to manage across the organisations the expectations of the Partnership | Unrealistic expectations of the partnership on day 1. | 2 | 3 | 6 | Clear Communications Strategy. |
| |
R9 |
| Corporate control over in scope areas (e.g. Property) not properly defined for transfer | Boundaries of responsibility unclear causing duplicity and early tensions | 1 | 3 | Ensure clear lines of responsibility in scope and that governance mechanisms exist early to deal with any disputes |
| ||
R11 |
| Corporate commitment to the inclusion of additional out-of-scope areas within the partnership | Business Case does not depend on these service areas but nevertheless wide support for the partnership is a necessary component in achieving Benefits Realisation. | 1 | 2 | 2 | Out-of-scope services to be reviewed against established criteria used for in-scope and approval taken for inclusion at SMB |
| |
R10 |
| Unauthorised media contact | Negative press coverage | 1 | 2 | 2 | Staff to be advised of effect of unauthorised media contact |
| |