Appendix A: comparison of key features, MISMA vs. the Model Agreement
Feature | ||
Project Type | Large, complex new-build ICT or technology-enabled change. | Small to medium, second/third generation, outsourced ICT services which involve little or no application development activity. |
New development activity | Significant and possibly high risk. | Not significant and low risk. |
Core services | Operational services; Additional services; Future services. | Transition services/activities; Legacy services; Transformed services. |
Due diligence | Expected to be a significant task, particularly in relation to the Operating Environment. Risk in not completing adequate due diligence could be high. | Operating Environment issues not significant, reducing the amount of due diligence required and the associated risks. |
Pre-service commencement | Not applicable. | Transition and services/activities in accordance with contractual Transition Plan and transition milestones. |
Service commencement and ATP | On Service Commencement Date following "Authority To Proceed" (ATP) after development, implementation and successful testing. | Legacy services from the Service Commencement Date. Transformed services following testing and ATP (see Section 3) |
Pre-ATP activity | Implementation and testing phases containing a number of contractually fixed milestones. | Transformation phase in parallel with delivery of legacy services ending in ATP milestone (other milestones are optional). Transformation in accordance with contractual Transformation Plan and milestones (including ATP). |
Pre-ATP testing | Detailed test plans. | Test plans proportionate to delivery risk of new service arrangements. |
Assets | Title of assets normally assigned to service provider creating duty of care and insurance responsibilities. | Some or all assets will transfer to the Contractor at Service Commencement Date. Title of assets procured in support of transformation likely to be with Contractor. |
Intellectual Property Rights | Rights ownership with the party best able to exploit them. Source code for project specific software held in Escrow. | Insignificant project-specific IP. No automatic associated Escrow obligations. |
Supply Chain | Key subcontractors can play major delivery role. Hence option for Authority to possess significant supply chain rights and require flow-down of key clauses into subcontracts. | Subcontracting typically not significant and full supply chain rights not required. |
Step-in | Various triggers for full or partial step-in. | No step-in rights. |
Authority termination for convenience | Right exists and may be unfettered. | No right. |
Payment | Recoverable (until Contract Performance Point) payments on successful achievement of milestones. Option of fully recoverable phase payments (down payments on milestone payments). Monthly service payments. | No CPP. Phase and milestone payments unlikely although there may be a single non-recoverable payment at ATP. Monthly service payments. |
Financial Model | Contractualised basis of payment calculation, change control pricing, termination payment calculation, etc. | No detailed financial model. |