3.1.3.3  Performance Confidence Assessment

(Insert Name of Offeror A) was assigned a performance confidence assessment of (insert Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Unknown Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence, as appropriate).  Discussions should include sources of past performance information whether from CPARS or questionnaires.  For example, the team analyzed a total of (insert quantity for each category of) very relevant, relevant or somewhat relevant contracts. Of the (insert quantity by relevancy) contracts evaluated, CPARs existed on (insert quantity by relevancy) contracts.  The CPARs reflected ratings ranging from (insert color or narrative performance rating) to (insert color or narrative performance rating). Furthermore, approximately (insert percentage) of the CPARs reflected color ratings ranging from (insert color or narrative performance rating) to (insert color or narrative performance rating). The remaining (insert percentage) of the CPARs reflected CPAR ratings of (insert color or narrative performance rating). (Include a similar summary of the review and assessment of the questionnaires that were sent out and responses received for each category of very relevant, relevant or somewhat relevant contracts).

Strong Points, Positive Performance

The PCAG identified the following positive aspects of performance:
(Use bullet statements to list strong points.)

Weak Points, Negative Performance

The PCAG identified the following negative aspects of performance:
(Use bullet statements to list weak points.)