Performance Confidence Assessment

OFFEROR: A

CONFIDENCE RATING:  SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE

POSITIVE ASPECTS:

•  Information which supports the performance risk rating

NEGATIVE ASPECTS:  

•  Information which supports the performance risk rating

CONCLUSIONS:  

•  Give a brief narrative which supports the overall risk rating

•  If you have assessed a SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE or SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE with negative aspects, explain why these don't have an impact on the rating.

•  If there are no significant positive or negative aspects, state why the confidence rating is low -- i.e., all data received indicated contractor met management performance requirements, all CPARs reviewed were rated green in management, therefore, the PCAG has little doubt that the contractor can perform the management effort as proposed.

•  If the confidence assessment is LIMITED or NO CONFIDENCE, there should be adequate justification in the conclusions.  Reference specific programs and the problems associated with the programs.  Identify offeror response to the problems and why the PCAG does not think the offeror's response will alleviate the risk.  Identify the potential impact to the current acquisition if this problem occurs again.