3.1.3.2  Programs/Contracts Evaluated

The PCAG evaluated the following programs/contracts performed by (Insert Name of Offeror A): (List by title major programs/contracts performed and evaluated by the PCAG.)

The PCAG relied upon the sources of data, described in paragraph 3.1.3.1 "Data Gathered" above, to assign performance confidence ratings for each offeror. (Describe the evaluation process consistent with the section M evaluation criteria).  In the event adverse data was reflected in a questionnaire, the SSET through the contracting officer provided the contractor an opportunity to respond if the contractor had not previously been offered the opportunity.

The PCAG used the following considerations in assigning the performance confidence ratings to each offeror (Note: tailor these considerations for your source selection). The offeror's overall work record; the number and severity of problems; the effectiveness of any corrective actions; and programmatics such as product similarity, complexity, contract type and phase of the program. The offerors' consolidated confidence rating with their strong points, weak points, and supporting rationale follow: