STANDARDISATION OF PF2 CONTRACTS PROVISION | SOURCE OF CHANGE WHERE RELEVANT | EXPLANATION OF HOW PROVISION HAS CHANGED THE SoPC4 POSITION |
Chapter 19: Price and Payment, Availability and Performance Mechanism |
|
|
Policy | The price, payment and performance regime (Chapters 7, 8 and 9 of SoPC4) has been overhauled and restated with additional guidance. | |
Policy | A pro forma Payment Mechanism (Schedule 5) will be issued shortly and added to Guidance after consultation. | |
Policy | A key feature of the Payment Mechanism has been added, namely that it must be fully auditable with sufficient information provided by the Contractor to allow the Authority to validate the calculation of the monthly Unitary Charge. | |
Policy | The overall approach has been changed to make it clear that a simpler mechanism that leads directly to cash deductions for failure is preferable to a complex two stage system whereby failure leads firstly to points which in turn lead to cash implications (eg once a certain number of points has been reached). | |
Policy | A presumption has been introduced against transferring usage risk unless there is a clear rationale for doing so. | |
Policy | Changes have been made to reflect the presumption that soft FM services will be excluded from the scope of the Services. | |
Market up-date | Draws attention to the fact that the market position for deductions for Unavailable but Used areas is commonly 50% of the full unavailability deduction. | |
Market up-date | A change to specify that if the Authority and Contractor disagree over whether an incident of unavailability has arisen, or whether it has been rectified, then the Authority's decision shall prevail for the purposes of calculating unavailability deductions. If this is not reflected in the calculation of the monthly Unitary Charge then the Authority is entitled to withhold payment of the amount of the relevant alleged deduction and if the Contractor so wishes it can refer the matter to Dispute Resolution. | |
Policy | The concept of Elective Services has been introduced. | |
Policy | Shifts the emphasis of Utility consumption risk towards the Authority from the point two years after the buildings have been accepted and demonstrated that they exhibit required utility efficiency characteristics. The Authority should also take tariff risk. | |
| Guidance on indexation (which was in SoPC4 Chapter 15 and Section 1.7.2(c)) is included here. |