Project structuring strategies were discussed in the previous section. Options are considered after the results of the financial analysis are seen, and indicate that the project is not viable based on its present configuration. Thus structuring is done with the endview of improving financial viability for private proponents, without necessarily relying on LGU support. Some of the options discussed in the previous chapter are:
1. Tariff structuring, e.g., transition from low to full cost recovery tariffs; or allow cross subsidy among users, as in the case of water supply where high volume commercial or industrial users are charged more per cubic meter of water compared to the low volume residential users;
2. Bundling or unbundling of project components;
3. Reducing or deferring capital investments; and
4. Extending term of the concession