Some projects may have unintended adverse effects on the IPs cultural practices, property rights, and socioeconomic conditions. Thus, the potential impacts of proposed projects need to be thoroughly examined together with the IPs. Participation of IPs will facilitate communication and understanding of the potential adverse impacts of the projects, how to mitigate or avoid these impacts and the benefits that they will derive from the project. Through the involvement of the IPs in the project development cycle, they will be in a better position to judge and make decisions on whether to give or not their consent and agreement in the implementation of the project. In case of disagreement on certain terms of the project such as the design, location, IPP, further negotiations with the IPs may be undertaken by the proponent. As much as possible, the proponent should avoid the physical displacement of IPs by exploring alternative project designs. When avoidance is impossible, a resettlement package that is acceptable and meeting the requirements of the IPs must be provided and properly executed. If possible, the plan will also allow the relocated IPs to return to their ancestral lands when the reasons for their relocation cease to exist. The consent and agreement between the proponent and the IPs shall be documented in a signed covenant.