| Emerging best practice |
Existing guidance outlines formal approaches and processes to establishing, monitoring and evaluating performance. Determining the right measures, and the right number of measures, to include in a contract is important, but needs to form part of a wider process:
| Get | Focus on what matters | Time should be invested to produce measures that flow from the strategy that outlines expected outcomes - the key things that matter. |
Proportional | The burden of work required, such as in obtaining information and monitoring, should not outweigh benefits when considering the number of measures and access to robust data. | ||
Clear | Need advance agreement on the purpose, definition and measurement of each measure. | ||
Strong evidence base | Evidence gives confidence that targets are achievable. | ||
| Review | Where possible amend key performance indicators during a contract lifetime without altering the balance between risk and reward. Indicators that probably should be changed may include those where incentives linked to measures are too small to matter; that are not providing the right incentives; have insufficient information to monitor performance, or where the time needed to monitor performance outweighs the benefits gained. A regular review allows government to consider whether indicators remain relevant. | |
| Use other | A well-designed set of performance measures should motivate suppliers but they should be used alongside other methods. See client leadership focuses on what matters and understand suppliers' motivation. | |