Respondents may identify any State requirements where an alternative position would provide a significant value for money benefit to the State. Any financial benefit should be specifically identified.
[Note: This does not include Scope Ladder items.]
Value for money enhancements included in the Proposal resulting from a departure from, or variation to, the State's requirements, should be noted as Departures to the Technical Specification, the Services Specification or the Draft State Project Documents but additional options may also be separately highlighted in this section.
Information on value for money enhancements should be presented in a manner outlining the following:
• proposed change;
• rationale;
• confirmation of deliverability and bankability of the enhancement, including evidence of the Respondents' commitment to the enhancement; and
• value for money impact in nominal (per Quarter) and NPV terms.