Utility Infrastructure Relocations

The Authority also proceeded with construction in the Central Valley without completing agreements with utility companies or ensuring it had a full understanding of the magnitude of the utility infrastructure that it would need to relocate or how it would relocate those utilities. As a result, it could not properly budget for these costs. For example, the Authority originally expected to directly pay utility providers, such as PG&E and AT&T Inc., to relocate utilities for Project 1's planned sites before construction, and it set aside nearly $69 million for this work. However, the Authority later determined the utilities would not be able to complete the relocations in time to meet construction deadlines, and in June 2015, it reassigned the work to the construction contractor. In February 2017, the Authority estimated that completing all of this work for Project 1 would ultimately cost $216 million. However, in April 2018, it provided the board with another revised estimate, which projected that costs would rise to $396 million. Unlike delays in land acquisition, the Authority's poor estimates for utility work did not create costs where it might otherwise have had none. However, given that Project 1's original construction contract was for $970 million, we find it concerning that the Authority failed to anticipate what it now expects will be nearly $400 million in additional costs. Had it developed a better understanding of the costs related to relocating utilities before beginning construction, it might have explored ways of mitigating those costs.

Given that Project 1's original construction contract was for $970 million, we find it concerning that the Authority failed to anticipate what it now expects will be nearly $400 million in additional costs.

For the next project-Project 2/3-the Authority preemptively assigned utility relocations to the construction contractor. However, the Authority still did not execute an agreement with PG&E specifying the distribution of relocation work between the contractor and the utility for over a year after signing the construction contract. As a result, it accounted for this delay, along with delays related to right-of-way acquisition and other issues, by approving additional cost and time for the construction contract. The Authority has not had to add time for Project 4, but utility relocations have created additional costs. According to information it provided to us in July 2018, problems with utilities across the three Central Valley projects had already accounted for $215 million in costs not included in the Authority's original budgets. The majority of these costs-$167 million-have come from Project 1, likely because it is the furthest along. Project 2/3 and Project 4 have experienced $29 million and $19 million in additional costs, respectively.