1 This report is about what happened to Carillion's two major public sector construction contracts after it collapsed and how the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) operates in these circumstances. Carillion plc went into liquidation on 15 January 2018. In June 2018 we reported how government worked to ensure continuity of the public services operated by Carillion during the liquidation. But Carillion's construction contracts stopped. At the time, Carillion was the main construction contractor for two new hospitals, both being built under PFI:
• the Midland Metropolitan Hospital in Sandwell, West Midlands (Midland Metropolitan). This is to be used by the Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (referred to in this report as 'the Sandwell Trust' or 'the Trust' as appropriate); and
• the Royal Liverpool University Hospital (Royal Liverpool). This is to be used by the Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which was formed on 1 October 2019 through a merger between the Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (referred to as 'the Liverpool Trust' or 'the Trust' as appropriate) and another NHS trust.
2 Under the original PFI arrangements, dedicated private companies - The Hospital Company (Sandwell) Ltd and The Hospital Company (Liverpool) Ltd (both referred to in this report as 'the PFI company') - were responsible for the delivery of each hospital and held the finance. These companies were to be financed by £57 million from shareholders (including Carillion), £395 million loans from investors (mainly banks) and £215 million of government funding. The PFI companies had contracts with Carillion to deliver the hospitals to an agreed price.
3 The principle behind PFI is that the PFI companies are responsible for the provision of the asset over a period of around 30 years. The PFI companies, and hence the PFI investors, are only paid for the hospital if it is built and available for use. This works by spreading the Trust's payments for the cost of building and maintaining the hospital over the period of the contract, through a monthly 'unitary charge'. The Trust receives ownership of the hospital after the contract has ended.
4 The projects were at different stages of construction when Carillion stopped work. The Royal Liverpool was nearing completion and the Midland Metropolitan was about two-thirds complete. But both hospitals were already behind schedule and Carillion's costs were rising. PFI companies are designed with little spare contingency funding as they pass the risks to their contractors. They are reliant on the financial strength of the contractor to deliver the buildings to the agreed price. But in this case this was not viable because of Carillion's collapse. By autumn 2018 it was clear that both PFI companies could not replace Carillion with another contractor using the remaining money left in the projects.
5 HM Treasury, the Cabinet Office, the Department of Health & Social Care, and NHS Improvement (the Departments) collectively agreed to replace the two PFI schemes with public financing. Work then restarted at Royal Liverpool, with a new main contractor addressing problems with Carillion's work. At Midland Metropolitan, the contract to complete the work was awarded to Balfour Beatty in December 2019.
6 This investigation is thus a case study on what happens to a PFI construction project when it goes wrong. The PFI companies were expected to replace the construction contractor and carry on. But they could only do that until the point at which the cost to complete grew larger than the funds available to the project. On the one hand fixed-price contracts, like PFIs, can ensure that contractors are both incentivised to manage costs and bear the brunt of cost rises. On the other hand, some risk ultimately remains with the public sector; when things go wrong beyond a certain tipping point, the public sector will bear the consequences. For these projects the tipping point was reached through a combination of high cost overruns on the construction and the failure of the contractor who had been expected to pay for them.
7 The investigation focuses on the role of central government and the Trusts in relation to the two hospital projects before, during and after Carillion's failure in January 2018. It sets out:
• the construction problems on each project (Part One);
• how the government and the Trusts dealt with the effects of the collapse of Carillion (Part Two); and
• the impact on the schedules and costs of the two projects (Part Three).
8 To prepare this report we have relied on information from the Departments and the Trusts. This is because many of the private organisations previously involved, including Carillion and the PFI companies, are in liquidation or have had their contracts terminated. We have not assessed the actions of Carillion, its directors or its advisers.
9 The Department of Health & Social Care and the Cabinet Office agree with the facts and findings of this report, but have asked us to note that our approach to presenting the costs of the two hospital projects is not the one that they would have chosen. We have expressed costs in real terms, to make them easier to understand, and therefore have not included the time value of money.