5.21 It is possible for the industry and clients to continue with the existing JCT and ICE Forms. Many may wish to do so, at least at present, because they are used to them. But, if so, I would strongly recommend that the existing forms be amended to take account of the principles set out in paragraph 5.18 above. My sixth principle, a choice of risks, is met in the JCT/ICE families through a variety of contracts rather than through the NEC's Core Clauses and options. I believe that the approach of the contract drafting committees, and their composition, needs to be changed, and I make recommendations accordingly later in this Chapter and in Appendix 4. Despite recommendations from some participants, I have not been prepared to recommend statutory intervention to impose the present contracts or subcontracts upon any parties to the process. That would not have been a realistic approach when those contracts themselves were controversial. But I believe that if the contracts - whether through use of an amended NEC or by changing the JCT/ICE documents - do meet the principles of this Chapter, it will then be appropriate to legislate to support them. If generally acceptable contracts have come into use, there will no longer be any need to use "bespoke" contracts or to impose unilateral and onerous conditions driven by greater commercial power. The law will reinforce agreed best practice, rather than being burdensome or unreasonable to one of the parties.