5.1  Establish the state of projects currently under construction

Australia has a record program of transport infrastructure projects in progress, yet Australians have only limited information about the status of these projects. It seems that even governments sometimes have only limited oversight, because some projects are managed by private entities under Public Private Partnerships.

Historically it has suited governments to run their infrastructure programs this way. A politician can expect to enjoy an electoral benefit from announcing a new project, particularly in the lead up to an election. If the project ends up costing more than was promised, there is every chance the original proponent will no longer be in the same role. And even if they are, there is a good chance the public will have forgotten the original cost promise that justified the investment.

Of 32 projects larger than $500 million committed to since 2016, only eight had a business case either published, or assessed by a relevant infrastructure body at the time of commitment (Figure 5.1 on page 31 and Table 5.1 on the following page).131 This means politicians are committing to projects without knowing whether they are in the community's interest to build, let alone whether they are the best choice for the money.

And governance has been no better for those projects which have received Commonwealth Government support. Of 22 large projects to which the Commonwealth Government has committed a contribution since 2016, only six had a business case published or assessed by Infrastructure Australia at the time of commitment. A further 14 were listed as 'initiatives' on IA's Priority List, indicating they 'have the potential to address a nationally significant problem or opportunity' but that their assessment had not yet been completed. The remaining two had not appeared on any Infrastructure Australia priority list at the time a state government committed to them.

As Infrastructure Australia put it:132

Too often we see projects being committed to before a business case has been prepared, a full set of options have been considered, and rigorous analysis of a potential project's benefits and costs has been undertaken.

Box 3 on page 32 details the particularly egregious example of Melbourne's suburban rail loop.

Table 5.1: Most large projects are still committed to without an approved business case

Project

State

C'wealth contribution

IA status at commitment

Business case timing

Business case distribution

Inland Rail

National

Y

Project

At time of commitment

Published.

Northern Road Upgrade

NSW

Y

Project

At time of commitment

Assessed by IA

M80 Upgrade (Northern & Western sections)

VIC

Y

Project

At time of commitment

Assessed by IA

North East Link

VIC

Y

Project

At time of commitment

Assessed by IA and published

West Gate Tunnel

VIC

N

None

At time of commitment

Published

Beerburrum to Nambour Rail

QLD

Y

Project

At time of commitment

Assessed by IA; summary released

Bruce Highway (Bribie Island Road to Steve Irwin Way)

QLD

Y

Initiative

At time of commitment

Summary published by BQ

Bruce Highway (Caloundra Road to Sunshine Motorway)

QLD

Y

Project

At time of commitment

Assessed by IA

F6 (Stage 1)

NSW

N

None

Assessed later

Summary published by INSW

M12 Motorway

NSW

Y

Initiative

Assessed later

Assessed by IA

Sydney Gateway

NSW

N

Initiative

Assessed later

Summary published by INSW

Sydney Metro West

NSW

N

Initiative

Assessed later

Summary published by INSW

Monash Freeway Upgrade (Stage 2)

VIC

Y

None

Assessed later

Assessed by IA

Bruce Highway (Woondum to Curra)

QLD

Y

Initiative

Assessed later

Assessed by IA

M1 Pacific Motorway - Eight Mile Plains to Daisy Hill

QLD

Y

Initiative

Assessed later

Assessed by IA; summary released

M1 Pacific Motorway - Varsity Lakes to Tugun

QLD

Y

Initiative

Assessed later

Assessed by IA; summary released

Thornlie Line Extension

WA

Y

Initiative

Assessed later

Assessed by IA

Yanchep Rail Extension

WA

Y

Initiative

Assessed later

Assessed by IA

New Bridgewater Bridge

TAS

Y

Initiative

Assessed later

Assessed by IA; didn't pass

Central Walk

NSW

N

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

North South Metro Rail Link

NSW

Y

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

Princes Highway Upgrade (Albion Park Rail Bypass)

NSW

Y

None

None assessed or published

 

Cranbourne Line Duplication

VIC

N

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

Hurstbridge Line Upgrade Stage 2

VIC

N

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

Melbourne Airport Rail

VIC

Y

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

Suburban Rail Loop

VIC

N

None

None assessed or published

 

Sunbury Line Upgrade

VIC

N

None

None assessed or published

 

Bruce Highway (Haughton River floodplain)

QLD

Y

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

Rockhampton Ring Road

QLD

N

None

None assessed or published

 

Bunbury Outer Ring Road (Stages 2 & 3)

WA

Y

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

North-South Corridor (Torrens River to Darlington)

SA

Y

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

Tonkin Highway Corridor Upgrades

WA

Y

Initiative

None assessed or published

 

Notes: IA = Infrastructure Australia. INSW = Infrastructure NSW. BQ = Building Queensland. Includes all fixed infrastructure projects with expected total cost greater than $500 million, committed to since December 2016. Does not include budget items referring to a program of smaller works. 'Committed' here refers to a budget allocation being made for construction in a state or territory budget, or the Commonwealth budget in the case of Inland Rail. A business case for Bruce Highway (Haughton River floodplain) was unsuccessfully assessed by IA..

Source: Grattan analysis.







____________________________________________________________________________

131. 'Committed' here refers to a budget allocation being made for construction of the project in a state or territory budget.

132. Infrastructure Australia (2018a, p. 1).

More Information